^Listen man, Im not picking on you at all. But when you come on to a forum and your first post is "who has the fast4r car, I bet I can beat that" your probably not going to get good results. Secondly its awesome that you have put all that work into your own car, people around here just like to see how you got to those numbers. Once you tell us all the mods you have done, then comes the "oh yeah that would make around that whp" but until then your just pissing in the wind.
Quote:
|
Quote:
Exactly; noone is "talking shit" and I'm not e-thuggin' you. You come into our forum trying to claim superiority, and all we're letting you know is that we've seen it before, and straight numbers aren't going to impress most of us. It doesn't mean it's not cool, and good on you for trying, but we're more likely to respect you if you post what you've got done to your car (since you did do it all yourself). You can't come on and try to prove something to a bunch of skeptics without proof. So far, multiple people, including people from race shops, and with quite a bit of experience have asked you what you have done, and you've dodged it every time. THAT is why we're skeptical. |
Quote:
|
Personally I become skeptical the moment someone dogs on "racing against cones" after stating that they enjoy racing in a straight line. :P
But whatever. . . Mr. Killer, you've gone about joining this community all wrong. Surely you could have discerned by reading through this thread that no one here is particularly inclined to participate in "bigger dick" dyno contests. . . Perhaps you should check out the Motorsports section of the forum and read some of the threads chronicling past autocross competitions and track days. |
I say, come chase some cones with us and see how much that claimed "500+" ponies is actually helping you... I bet my ~130 whp OWNS YOU!!! :lol:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Chasing cones is really fun. I've only done it once and wish I had more time to participate. My guess is the turbo is huge so it definately would not be fun in autocross and would get stomped by much lesser cars. It certainly (in my humble opinion) takes a lot more skill to chase cones than perfecting your reaction and 60 foot time down the straight. Not that there is no skill involved in drag racing; I just think that actually turning the steering wheel = driving.
|
new dyno numbers
1 Attachment(s)
Hey all here are the new dyno numbers for my vehicle. Dean thanks for the update when you get around to it.
Name: Ryan Tanoue Car: 2004 WRX Mods: Hydra Nemisis stand alone EMS, 2.5L JDM FXT long block, Perrin Rotated mount kit, Garrett GT3076 .63A/R, Perrin FMIC, Tial 44mm WG, Tial BOV, TGVs deleted, Helix Headers, Perrin fuel rails, helix 860cc injectors, Perrin crank pully, Ported wrx throttle body (proflow design), Borla cat back exhaust. Wheel HP: 341 @ 6300 RPM's Wheel TQ: 304 @ 5200 RPM's Tuned by Andy at Speed Element on their Dyno Dynamics Dyno. |
NICE! Good stuff Ryan! By the look of that power curve, that thing pushes your eyeballs back in your skull after 4k! :eek:
|
yea....i was kind of supprised that it didnt make as much torque as i expected, but it hits full boost(22psi) at just over 4K so yea it gets pretty nuts after that. eventhough the max tq dosnt hit until over 5k having full boost that early is great and yea it has pretty awesome power all around. i like it hahaha.
ryan |
Dyno looks great Ryan congrats. Is AVCS working on your setup?
Mike |
hey mike, yea its working, but in "default" mode i believe. My Hydra did not come with the avcs control harness....i may get that installed and tuned at a later date. do you think it will make a big difference if i had control of the avcs? I was under the impression that in default it would automatically set to the max? thanks mike.
ryan |
Wow Ryan! that is impressive.
|
Quote:
I have never tested where the solenoids default to if set with no control as I have no way of measuring them at that point (only when AVCS is working and I can log them) but I have witnessed enough setups without AVCS control to see a substantial midrange torque and fuel economy difference. Mike |
Yeah, if you have no control going to the AVCS, it defaults to the high-rpm setting and kills your low end.
|
i see i see. i didnt realize this, but i will hopefully correct it sooner than later. thanks for the info mike, ill talk to you about this stuff over aim. i sure would like some more tq!...not that i dont have any, but more is always better when its right there.
ryan |
Quote:
I put Andy's info in to the Mod section and just dyno info on the dyno line... |
yup dean it was on 91 crappy pump. but thats alright. ill hopefully get the AVCS wired and tuned by summer time, but for now the car runs great and i am very happy with it.
ryan |
via PM...
I cleaned up the format, hope it is OK... ----- Name: Derick D. (Joeyy) Car: 2005 WRX Wagon Mods: K&N air filter, Cobb up pipe, Cobb TBE, Walbro fuel pump, Cobb AP, ProTune by db tuned. Wheel HP: 221.7 @6000 RPM Wheel Torque: 218.2 @ 4250 RPM Dyno: Mustang @ db tuned 03/12/2007 10:34 A.M |
Uh oh. :(
|
Isn't that S-Squared's old dyno? That has to be close to stock STi numbers.
|
Yep, on both counts; that's better than most stock STi's.
|
That's impressive!
Nick, Cody ... you guys can hide out in SM if you want ;) |
Or sack up and get ProTuned. :lol:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All Content Copyright Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras unless otherwise noted.