Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras

Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras (https://www.seccs.org/forums/index.php)
-   Off Topic Chat (https://www.seccs.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   2009 Nissan GT-R (https://www.seccs.org/forums/showthread.php?t=6324)

cody 2007-10-17 10:24 AM

2009 Nissan GT-R
 


Quote:

FIRST REVIEW OF THE GT-R

By Autoweek:
(This is the full article below, I got from another forum. The link now only shows the edited article.)
http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl...8/newsletter01

--------------------------------------------------

FIRST DRIVE: 2009 Nissan GT-R
Grit yer teeth and say GT-RRRRRRRR

Yes, it lives up to all the hype!

The coming Nissan GT-R is a world-class supercar: Top speed of 193 mph, 0-60 in 3.5 seconds, a 473 hp, 433 lb ft twin-turbo V6 mounted in the front and driving all four wheels through a rear-mounted transaxle. Take a breath. Okay, continue. And a dual-clutch six-speed automatic you can operate via paddles on the steering wheel.

After a full day driving it on the Nurburgring, the Autobahn and up and over numerous little German country roads we can easily say this is one car that was not over hyped. It is truly a world-class supercar on par with, if not just ahead of, the iconic Porsche Turbo. (They had a Porsche Turbo on hand, too, and we thought the GT-R felt better tied down.)

But it's one thing to put a license plate on a race car and call it streetable. Chief engineer Kazutoshi Mizuno said the new GT-R was designed and engineered as an all-around, all-season, all-weather car that is comfortable to drive every day, even at normal speeds on a normal day.

During the few minutes we drove at what could be called a "normal pace" that day we'd have to say we agree with him. But given only a few hours at the wheel of this, the most highly anticipated supercar in years, we were only in "normal" mode for very brief spurts. The rest of the time we were at some level between "pushing it" and "hammering on the mutha'."

Our first time behind the wheel was on the A48 autobahn in Germany somewhere out around Koblenz or Koln or some other K-town where the German socialist government had not yet succeeded in adding those awful 120-km-hr speed limits. It was like Bonneville with elevation changes and guardrails. The only limitation out here was aerodynamic. Hence, we were obliged to go all-out whompin' fast the whole time.

Rolling right out of the autobahn rest stop where we rendezvoused with the Japanese engineering support crew, we nailed the throttle to the floor and man did the throttle respond. The 3.8-liter VR38 V6 is "an evolution" of the award-winning VQ engine family. It sits up front, with two of its six cylinders forward of the front axle and four aft. Two bagel-sized IHI turbos sit right at the exhaust manifold for quick response. The 433 lb ft of torque rails across the tach from 3200 to 5200 rpm. Peak 473 hp comes at 6400 revs.

A carbon fiber prop shaft ("Good damping and stiffness") runs back to the transaxle, incorporating the clutch, transmission and transaxle altogether. The shifting is done via a direct, twin-clutch system. One clutch handles the odd gears and another clutch handles the even ones. Shifts take 0.2 seconds. There are BorgWarner triple-cone synchronizers for all gears. Another shaft runs forward from that transaxle to send power to the front wheels. Below 25 mph the torque split is 50/50, above that, under normal driving, the split is 40/60. But it can split up to 2/98 under hard acceleration, which was what we were giving it.

Our car rode on 20-inch wheels wrapped by Bridgestone Potenza RE070s, 255/40 in front and 285/35 rears. Front suspension was upper and lower A-arms and the rear was a five-link.

It's always fun to go from zero to warp factor in a right hand-drive car using a jet-lagged left hand-drive brain, trying not to turn on the windshield wipers when you think you're hitting the turn signal.

The GT-R lists quarter-mile time at 11.7 seconds and entering the Autobahn we had no reason to doubt that. The turbo boost was, as promised, very progressive, with little or no discernable lag, just smooth, even power delivery.

Despite the late-morning hour and the mid-week day, there were still a few cars in the way. When we eased onto the 15.2-inch ventilated cross-drilled Brembo brakes from well into triple-digit speeds the car slowed without drama. But then traffic would clear out and the GT-R resumed its high velocity chase with ease.

There are three settings for the Bilstein Damptronic shocks: R, Sports and Comfort. We went out in Sports.

Top speed is listed at 193 mph but with traffic the best we could do was 176. You wouldn't try that in any country but Germany, where you can usually assume everyone else is paying attention. There was a Japanese engineer riding shotgun over on the left whom we dubbed "Bushido engineer-o" or brave engineer. He thought that was pretty funny.

While the coefficient of drag is an impressive 0.27, more than almost any production car, the GT-R also produces downforce at each axle, something very few production cars can claim.

"Cd is more important than downforce on a G35," said chief designer Hiroshi Hasegawa. "But in the case of the GT-R we have to make downforce."

At 193 mph you might appreciate that philosophy.

The first time we went out, the right front wheel felt just a little out of balance, so we came back in and they changed all four wheels. They're efficient, these guys. After that the car was smooth as well as stable and safe, due in equal parts to the German roadway and the Japanese engineering.

The whole car sits on the new PM platform, PM meaning Prime Midship. It's an evolution of the ubiquitous FM platform that sits underneath everything from 350Zs to crossover SUVs. The PM incorporates what Mizuno-san called a "hybrid superstructure body." There is carbon-injected material in the front end and carbon composite material underneath for aerodynamic downforce. There's even some polypropylene in the body, too. In any case, it's not just another FM variant.

We truly enjoyed the Autobahn experience. This is the perfect car for such a top-speed run-it gives such a sense of control at those speeds that you feel like you could do anything.

Next on our agenda of "anything" were some miles of country road. We were able to drive the GT-R back-to-back with a Porsche Turbo.

"Okay now, please enjoy," said the Nissan technician as we exited the company compound down the street from the Nurburgring.

After "much spirited driving," we can say the Turbo had a good deal more lag and more dive and squat than the GT-R. But once the Porsche got spooled up, achtung, baby. It felt lighter and the steering felt quicker, too. The biggest difference between the two was that the Turbo demanded more of its driver while the GT-R was easier to handle, flatter and more stable. We'd be happy with either one, if you're considering a birthday present or anything.

Next up on this Disneyland of a day was Der Nurburgring. This is what all those teenagers whose parents have not taken away their Playstation access really want to do: drive an actual GT-R around the actual Nurburgring as fast as grip, guts and gasoline allow.

Man-oh-flippin'-man. The real deal is about 100 times more thrilling than any computer simulation, even those with the little plastic steering wheel and feet pedals attached.

This was the new Nurburgring, too. Nissan wasn't foolish enough to turn this small squadron of car writer hacks loose on the narrow, blind, crazy-dangerous Nordschliefe. At the time of our drive there were only three prototype GT-Rs extant in the world, and all the apologizing on Earth wouldn't bring one back if you crunched it.

The new Nurburgring is faster, with wide, sweeping turns bordered by runoff areas so huge that even the most no-talent buffoon could likely stay on the pavement. So we did.

All the Japanese engineers and executives had been telling everyone that there was a 35-mph speed limit in the pits, but in all the excitement we kind of forgot about it and nailed the throttle right out of the parking spot right there in pit lane. The wide, low, squealing run-flat tires laid down long patches of black rubber as we launched past the closed garages, pulling back on the right paddle to shift the rear-mounted dual-clutch six-speed transaxle every time the engine got close to its 7000-rpm redline.

In no time at all we were roaring onto pit-out near the end of the straight and directly into the low, evening sun. By the time we got fully out on the front straight and were shifting up from four to five or so, the sun was directly in front of the GT-R and streaming into the windshield; we were trying to remember if that first right-hander came at this rise or just past it. It was just past it, but we'd already started braking and downshifting, the GR6's "synchro-rev control," which perfectly matched each downshift with a throttle blip much better than we'd ever have been able to match it.

Tiptoeing through the first couple turns to avoid the infamy of the run-off gravel, the car felt perfectly safe and willing. So we hammered it up through the gears down the hill and to the far 180-degree turn and started to feel more confident. By the end of the first lap we were flat out on the front straight, roaring up through all six gears for all it was worth.

Nissan lists lateral g's at 0.99, and we certainly bumped up against that in many a Nurburgring corner.

We only got three full laps and no one was timing us, so you'll just have to assume we set the lap record. Earlier, Mizuno-san had offered some lap times from the Nordschliefe for various cars driven by the German magazine SportAuto. Those times are driver-dependent, track-knowledge-dependent, weather-, traffic- and bunny-crossing-the-track dependent. But Mizuno suggested the GT-R could get anywhere from 7:44 on up, with most laps coming in between 7:55 and 7:58. So he suggested the GT-R's strong suit was that it offered "the best cost per lap time." For whatever that's worth.

The GT-R will be worth somewhere in the low-$70,000 range, which does make it perhaps the best cost per lap. We'll know for sure when it enters U.S. showrooms in May or June. Japan will get first crack at it, we get second and the Europeans, who did such a great job of getting out of our way during our Autobahn drive, will have to get it third.


SPECS: 2009 Nissan GT-R
On Sale: May/June

Base Price: Low 70s

Drivetrain: 3.8-liter, 473-hp, 433-lb-ft twin turbocharged V6; awd, six-speed automatic

Curb Weight: 3792 pounds

0-60: 3.5 seconds

Fuel Economy (EPA Combined): 21 mpg (mfg. target)
http://www.wrxfanatics.com/uploads/m...192566089.jpeg
Quote:

Nissan says the GT-R will accelerate from zero to 60 mph in 3.5 seconds, finish the quarter-mile in 11.7 seconds and reach a top speed of 192 mph. Base price is expected to be less than $80,000.

If true, the GT-R will be serious competition for the Porsche 911 Turbo, which it has been routinely seen testing alongside.
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do....photopanel..1

MPREZIV 2007-10-17 10:27 AM

I totally plan on humping the first one Nissan of Reno sees, if we see one...

100_Percent_Juice 2007-10-17 10:45 AM

that is so bad ass. eat that new S5.

Nick Koan 2007-10-17 10:48 AM

Well, if its priced like a Z06, but can only beat regular Corvettes, I'm starting to think the Z06 might be the better deal.

cody 2007-10-17 10:58 AM

I guess that's the trade off for having a functional car that kicks ass on the track instead of a track car that has a license plate.

JonnydaJibba 2007-10-17 11:02 AM

Since when is a z06 a track car? They aren't that undrivable are they? I've driven a C5 once and it was super easy to drive in a normal manner. But a C5 is far from a new Z06.

cody 2007-10-17 11:05 AM

Nah, a guy I know that has one drives it daily and it even gets good gas milage. I just have a thing for cars that can "do it all".

Nick Koan 2007-10-17 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cody (Post 108188)
Nah, a guy I know that has one drives it daily and it even gets good gas milage. I just have a thing for cars that can "do it all".

The GT-R can tow a boat?

cody 2007-10-17 11:11 AM

Yah, and jump the drawbridge.

Nick Koan 2007-10-17 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cody (Post 108190)
Yah, and jump the drawbridge.

Well, then it better have Dixie horns on it too.

Kevin M 2007-10-17 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nick Koan (Post 108189)
The GT-R can tow a boat?

Define "boat."

Nick Koan 2007-10-17 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BAN SUVS (Post 108193)
Define "boat."

1968 Ford Galaxie

Kevin M 2007-10-17 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nick Koan (Post 108195)
1968 Ford Galaxie

That's exactly what I had in mind. :lol:

cody 2007-10-17 12:38 PM

From http://www.egmcartech.com/2007/10/17/nissa...ts-slr-mclaren/

-----------------------------------------------------

Nissan GT-R lapped Nurburgring in 7:35 - beats SLR McLaren
Posted on: October 17th, 2007

So are you sick of the Nissan GT-R coverage yet? Well to bad because we're not. Motor Trend is now reporting that when the GT-R was lapping the Nurburgring, Nissan engineers recorded the best lap time at 7:35.

Reliable sources told Motor Trend that the Nissan GT-R beat the Porsche 996 GT2, Porsche 977 Turbo and the Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren. The 7:35 time of the Nissan GT-R is one second slower than the Koenigsegg CCR and two seconds slower than the Pagani Zonda F.

Nissan is still at the Nurburgring attempting to beat its own and other lap times. Earlier this morning we reported the official specs on the GT-R. The Nissan GT-R is powered by a 3.8 liter V6 engine that produces 473 horsepower and 434 lb-ft of torque. 0-60 mph takes a quick 3.5 seconds while top speed is 192 mph.

Nick Koan 2007-10-17 12:43 PM

Quote:

So are you sick of the Nissan GT-R coverage yet?
Kinda.

AtomicLabMonkey 2007-10-17 01:04 PM

Yay. A fugly, $80,000 car that nobody but rich jackoffs can afford to own. I can barely contain my excitement. :rolleyes:

NevadaSTi 2007-10-17 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nick Koan (Post 108195)
1968 Ford Galaxie

At least you guys didn't bag on my car. LOL

That GT-R is supper hot!!!!

Dean 2007-10-17 01:16 PM

Yeah, if I'm going to spend $80K it isn't on a GT-R.

Hell, unless somebody gives me a couple million to live off of I am not spending $80K on anything, much less something I am taking to the track. And they won't make enough of them so they will ever be a good <$20K track car.

Pass.

cody 2007-10-17 01:36 PM

Well, I'm impressed. Sure it's too expensive for 99% of us, but it's got all the goods of a super-car at half the price plus it's daily drivable and even has a backseat and a nice trunk. I think it may take some business away from the Audi R8 anyway (another drool worthy car). Why didn't they call it an Infinity Skyline? Wouldn't that have made them more marketable?

Kevin M 2007-10-17 01:39 PM

They would have had to load it down with gimmicks and more sound deadening and 19 speakers and yadda yadda yadda. Infiniti has always ben the luxury/gadget marque, even in the segment.

Nick Koan 2007-10-17 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cody (Post 108219)
Well, I'm impressed. Sure it's too expensive for 99% of us, but it's got all the goods of a super-car at half the price plus it's daily drivable and even has a backseat and a nice trunk. I think it may take some business away from the Audi R8 anyway (another drool worthy car). Why didn't they call it an Infinity Skyline? Wouldn't that have made them more marketable?

I remember reading a release saying it was basically the Gran Trurismo generation that caused them to call it a Nissan instead of Infiniti.

As to why they didn't call it the Skyline? Well, the Skyline is much like the Camry or every other boring car in Japan, except that it came in flavors ranging super boring all the way up to borderline-supercar with the GT-R trim. I guess by not calling it the Skyline they are saying, "Look, this is a supercar and only a supercar. There will be no <2.0L 2WD econobox model" The JDM Skyline will get to keep on selling like it has with its current trim(s), and the GT-R will get to be the supercar that it has always wanted to be.

cody 2007-10-17 02:20 PM

^Makes sense.

AtomicLabMonkey 2007-10-17 03:35 PM

I couldn't possibly give less of a flying fuck about supercars. Seriously, what's the goddamn point of even talking about them? None of us will probably ever drive one, let alone own it. Those cars are simply an exercise in ego-stroking for people with too much time & money on their hands. I don't know about anyone else, but I don't really care to waste my energy drooling over something unattainable anymore.

And don't say they're useful because the R&D/tech that goes into them filters down to the regular cars us peons drive, because the knowledge of how to make a car go decently fast, relatively cheaply, has been around for decades. All the R&D is about how to pile as much luxury shit into the box as they can while staying the smallest fraction of a step ahead of competitors. Simply look at the weight of most "performance" cars built today, even the supercars, and you can see where design priorities are. For years upon years they've gotten bigger & heavier instead of getting lighter, which is bass-fucking-ackwards. Especially in an era where lightweight materials abound and structural designs are well optimized through CAD/FEA.

Goddammit I hate the auto industry, and everyone that supports & encourages them by actually buying these stupid fucking piece of shit cars. Fucking stupid fucks.

Fuck.

Nick Koan 2007-10-17 03:42 PM

^Makes sense.

tysonK 2007-10-17 03:44 PM

^Yeah I'm with Austin. I love the new GT-R!!!!

cody 2007-10-17 03:50 PM

:lol:

sperry 2007-10-17 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtomicLabMonkey (Post 108240)
I couldn't possibly give less of a flying fuck about supercars. Seriously, what's the goddamn point of even talking about them? None of us will probably ever drive one, let alone own it. Those cars are simply an exercise in ego-stroking for people with too much time & money on their hands. I don't know about anyone else, but I don't really care to waste my energy drooling over something unattainable anymore.

And don't say they're useful because the R&D/tech that goes into them filters down to the regular cars us peons drive, because the knowledge of how to make a car go decently fast, relatively cheaply, has been around for decades. All the R&D is about how to pile as much luxury shit into the box as they can while staying the smallest fraction of a step ahead of competitors. Simply look at the weight of most "performance" cars built today, even the supercars, and you can see where design priorities are. For years upon years they've gotten bigger & heavier instead of getting lighter, which is bass-fucking-ackwards. Especially in an era where lightweight materials abound and structural designs are well optimized through CAD/FEA.

Goddammit I hate the auto industry, and everyone that supports & encourages them by actually buying these stupid fucking piece of shit cars. Fucking stupid fucks.

Fuck.

Actually...

Supercars DO trickle down technology to the peon cars.

Look at the DSG quick-shift transmissions for example. Started in F1, made it into Ferraris, and now comes in the goddamn base Lancer. Same goes with the motor tech... the same stuff that helps for power (new materials, higher compression, forced induction, variable timing, etc) gets reused for economy. Why does Honda make awesome economy I4's? 'Cause they build kick-ass race bike motors first.

And cars are in fact lighter today than they were yesterday. Can you imagine what an all-steel body-on-frame car would have to weigh to meet current crash standards? Hell, a 7,000 lb Hummer can't match a Geo Metro in crash test results. Cars are de-facto heavier now 'cause of legislation and not so much due to additional luxury features. Leather seats haven't gotten heavier in the last 20 years... and the increased weight in gadgets is certainly offset by the reduced weigh due to electronics miniaturization. It's actually pretty impressive that even though sports-cars today are heavier due to safety and emissions regulations, they are also faster than they used to be.

I think what you're really bitching about is the loss of "purity" in sports cars. It's no longer about a solid motor in a stiff chassis with simple controls to allow the driver to go out and toss around a back road. Like in motor racing, competition has bread technology into every aspect of the car to make it faster, nicer, and better looking to increase sales all under the ever stricter rules for crash safety and emissions. Prices go up, and the pure sports car dies a quiet death.

Evo Mike 2007-10-17 04:16 PM

i love the new skyline. it's a bit overpriced imo.. but a great car none-the-less.

also, the only person that determines if he/she will or will not own one.. is themselves.

AtomicLabMonkey 2007-10-17 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evo Mike (Post 108246)
also, the only person that determines if he/she will or will not own one.. is themselves.

Keep clinging to that raft.

MPREZIV 2007-10-17 08:12 PM

I can at least stake my shot at driving one, but as Dean mentioned, for 80k, wouldn't buy it if I DID have the money.

doubleurx 2007-10-17 08:16 PM

I'm placing an order next week. The wife is pissed!

Evo Mike 2007-10-17 08:41 PM

it's true.. for 80k i'd consider a porsche turbo.. even though the new GTR is supposed to beat it down, there is some sort of status involved

JC 2007-10-17 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evo Mike (Post 108278)
it's true.. for 80k i'd consider a porsche turbo.. even though the new GTR is supposed to beat it down, there is some sort of status involved

A used one right? Because Porsche Turbos are $130k. I could see myself with a GTR in a few years. I've never been a huge fan of German cars and this is a solid alternative.

cody 2007-10-18 09:46 AM

Quote:


From http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Featu...e.photopanel..2.*

--------------------------------------------------

The Official Car of Godzilla
By John Pearley Huffman, Contributor Email


Date posted: 10-17-2007

STORY TOOLS http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/1...h-p-icon-l.gifPrint thishttp://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/1...h-s-icon-l.gifSave thishttp://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/1.../digg-icon.gifDigg this!http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/1...h-e-icon-l.gifEmail thishttp://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/1...-mp-icon-l.gifMost popularhttp://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/1...cious-icon.gifdel.icio.usThe 2009 Nissan GT-R isn't just entering the performance car market; it's detonating it.

Bulging with 473 horsepower from a twin-turbocharged V6, supported by an advanced rear-mounted transaxle, fortified by all-wheel drive and crafted around a high-tech chassis, the GT-R is built to shatter expectations, set new standards and, generally speaking, kick azz.

Due for its much-anticipated unveiling at the 2007 Tokyo Auto Show, the 2009 Nissan GT-R will finally arrive in the U.S. next spring. Nothing will ever be the same again.

Supercar Quickness?
Nissan tells us the GT-R will run from 0-100 km/h (62 mph) in just 3.5 seconds, slam through the quarter-mile in 11.7 seconds and top out at 193 mph. These are numbers spectacular enough to shake the reputations of supercars like the Ferrari F430, Lamborghini Gallardo and Porsche 911 Turbo. And it's the sort of performance that should easily transcend that of every previous Nissan GT-R dating all the way back to the original 1969 Skyline GT-R PGC10.

If Nissan even slightly over-delivers on its promise of performance, the GT-R could conceivably be quicker than Porsche's 911 Turbo. This car has been used by Nissan as the benchmark for the GT-R's development, and it runs to 60 mph in a scorching 3.4 seconds and rockets through the quarter-mile in 11.6 seconds at 118.5 mph.

Yet unlike previous generations of the GT-R, this new edition isn't based on a mass-produced automobile. This GT-R is its own thing; it's related to other Nissans in about the same way that the Porsche 911 is related to the Volkswagen Beetle. The new GT-R isn't just a Skyline hot rod.

Beyond all this, Nissan promises the GT-R's price will come in at just under $80,000 when it goes on sale early next year. This isn't cheap, but it lets this technological showpiece challenge the Corvette Z06 as the universe's greatest performance bargain.

Familiar Looks, Unfamiliar Engineering
How this car looks shouldn't be a surprise, since Nissan has been hinting at its general shape for almost seven years. Way back in 2001, the company's GT-R Concept previewed this car's aggressive dark grille, stiletto-sharp headlights, general roof shape and muscular fenders. A second GT-R Concept, shown during the 2006 auto show season, only differs from the production car in such details as bumper covers and a few tweaks of fender shape.

Familiar in appearance as it is, the substance of the new GT-R is astounding in its engineering audacity.

The basic unibody monocoque structure — including the roof — is built from steel, but carbon fiber makes up a portion of the front structure, including the radiator support. Forward of this, the bumper and grille are made of lightweight polypropylene plastic. The all-aluminum double-wishbone front suspension mounts to a die-cast aluminum subframe, while both doors are also built around die-cast aluminum frames. Aluminum skins are used for the hood, front fenders, doors and trunk lid. Finally carbon fiber appears again at the car's tail, where it's used for the underbody air diffuser.

The payoff, claims Nissan, is that while the GT-R's body has 10 percent more surface area than that of the Nissan 350Z, the new car's body-in-white is actually 10 percent lighter overall. And the GT-R has an almost ludicrously slippery 0.27 coefficient of drag (Cd).

At 183.1 inches overall, the GT-R is exactly as long as a new Infiniti G37 coupe. But while they're both 2+2 passenger packages, the resemblance is almost a coincidence. The GT-R's 109.4-inch wheelbase is 2.8 inches shorter than that of the G37, and its 74.6-inch width is 2.8 inches wider than the G37. In addition, the GT-R's overall height of 54.0 inches is almost an inch shorter than the Infiniti coupe. There is simply no way the GT-R will be confused with a G37.

Uncompromised Engine
Expectations have been that the GT-R would use a twin-turbocharged version of Nissan's justly acclaimed (and nearly ubiquitous) VQ-Series V6. In fact the new VR38 engine in the GT-R is related to the VQ in much the same way that Homo sapiens have evolved from Australopithecus — they might be related, but one is a more evolved species.

Each intercooled, twin-turbo VR38 V6 will be hand-assembled by one of 12 technicians for installation in the GT-R. As the name implies, the VR38 displaces 3.8 liters. It's built around an aluminum block, and the cylinder bores have been sprayed with a coating of plasma some 0.15mm thick to provide the sealing surface for the piston rings. This is in contrast to the normal practice of inserting 2.6mm iron cylinder liners for the same purpose. Nissan claims this process saves about 6.6 pounds in the weight of the engine.

The cylinder heads appear to be a conventional DOHC design. But each cylinder bank has its own separate intake plenum and throttle body. Yet the crowning glories of the VR38 are its twin IHI turbochargers. These lightweight units spool up so quickly that Nissan says a full 434 pound-feet of peak torque is available from 3,200-5,200 rpm, while peak power is 473 hp at 6,400 rpm.

Not only does the VR38 promise to deliver epic performance, but it also happens to be gorgeous. So gorgeous, in fact, that Nissan hasn't hidden it under plastic covers, and instead detailed it for display under the GT-R's hood.

The Nissan GT-R is a car that gets more charismatic as its body panels are stripped off.

Uncompromised Drivetrain
To put all the VR38's power to work, Nissan has conjured up a unique drivetrain. The rear-mounted transaxle incorporates the function of a conventional center differential for the all-wheel-drive system.

A carbon-fiber driveshaft extends from the back of the VR38 V6 to the transaxle, spinning at engine speed. The transaxle features a dual-clutch six-speed gearbox similar in configuration to Audi's DSG design. A computer analyzes various performance parameters — available traction, steering angle, vehicle speed and others — and then adjusts the front-to-rear torque split accordingly. The power for the front wheels then travels forward on a smaller carbon-fiber driveshaft set above and to the right of the primary driveshaft.

The torque split is reassessed and adjusted by the onboard computers every 0.2 second and varies between 50 percent front/50 percent rear to 100 percent rear-wheel drive.

The transmission can operate in fully automatic mode, but it's best enjoyed using the shift paddles mounted on the steering wheel. Nissan promises "F1 gearshift speeds," with downshifts assisted by synchronized, rev-controlled throttle blips to match engine and transmission speeds to further increase shift speed.

Suspended and Bound
Of course the GT-R uses a racecar-style suspension with cast-aluminum double wishbones at each corner. And the suspension operates in three damping modes: "R" for "Race," "S" for "Sports" (the default setting) and "C" for "Comfort." The Bilstein DampTronic shock absorbers have been developed especially for the GT-R.

Nissan says that the GT-R has the best braking performance ever measured during Japan's compulsory model approval tests. With massive 15.0-inch cross-drilled rotors at each corner clamped by six-piston Brembo calipers in the front and four-piston versions in the rear, the braking promises to defy the laws of physics — slam the brake pedal and the car ought to stop behind where it was.

Bridgestone and Dunlop will both supply run-flat performance tires for the GT-R, fitting 255/40ZR20s up front and 285/35ZR20s out back. Unlike current run-flats, Nissan avows that these tires have softer, more compliant sidewalls. And they're so very special that they're filled at the factory with nitrogen rather than that crummy air we all breathe, which ensures inflation pressure will be unaffected by humidity. (It's a racing thing.)

Go-Go Gadget
The GT-R's rear seats aren't meant to be occupied by actual human beings, but should be useful for transporting kids and parcels. On the other hand, the driver and front passenger are well cared for. Each gets an ergonomically aggressive throne in which to sit, plus elegant controls and switches to operate.

The centerpiece of the interior is a multifunction display in the dash that Nissan tells us was developed in conjunction with Polyphony Digital, the same company that developed the Gran Turismo video games for the Sony PlayStation.

The multifunction display can be used to monitor engine coolant temperature, oil temperature, oil pressure, transmission oil pressure, turbocharger boost pressure, torque split, throttle position, steering angle and longitudinal and lateral G-force. The display is also a data logger that can be used to improve driving technique and can display an optimal gearshift map for drivers obsessed with fuel economy. And, really, who would buy this car if they weren't determined to eke out the most mileage from every drop of gasoline?

Of course there's a satellite-based navigation system, while the onboard entertainment system can play every sort of media except maybe Beta video and eight-track audio tapes.

Iconic and Built To Stay That Way
From the four round lights and large spoiler on the deck lid to the tough muscularity of the front grille, every square inch of the 2009 Nissan GT-R reflects the carmaker's commitment to performance and the heritage established by the GT-Rs of the past.

And, best of all, the legend is on its way to America at last.

MPREZIV 2007-10-18 11:55 AM

The more tech stuff I read, the less I wanna work on it...

kidatari 2007-10-18 12:33 PM

Good lord. I must have one.

sperry 2007-10-18 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MPREZIV (Post 108298)
The more tech stuff I read, the less I wanna work on it...

But think of all the fun you'll have with the 3 months of training for all the new bits.

GC8.Love 2007-10-18 12:53 PM

Wow, that's actually kinda.. that's.. that's hot.


..excuse me. :oops:

MPREZIV 2007-10-18 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperry (Post 108301)
But think of all the fun you'll have with the 3 months of training for all the new bits.

The training is kinda fun... Multiple days down in the Bay Area, on the company's tab, talking waitresses into putting beers on the bill as "fruit juice", 9-3 class schedule...


We've been told by our area NNA rep. that we're slated to get one, and ONLY one, and there's a doctor in town that's all ready to write a big fat check for that sucker when it shows!

sperry 2007-10-18 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MPREZIV (Post 108303)
The training is kinda fun... Multiple days down in the Bay Area, on the company's tab, talking waitresses into putting beers on the bill as "fruit juice", 9-3 class schedule...


We've been told by our area NNA rep. that we're slated to get one, and ONLY one, and there's a doctor in town that's all ready to write a big fat check for that sucker when it shows!

Well, when it comes in... call me. I'll reserve half a day at the race track for "dealer inspection". :devil:

cody 2007-10-24 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'bedabi date='Oct 24 2007, 07:08 AM' post=772299 (WRXFanatics.com)
Nissan officially unveiled the GT-R last night at the Tokyo Motor Show.

And announced it's offical N'Ring lap time of 7:38, which was presented on video with a stop watch counter.

You can actually watch the full video here: http://www.nissan.co.jp/MS/TOKYO2007/E/index.html

For comparison:I like this shot.
http://www.wrxfanatics.com/uploads/m...193234602.jpeg


cody 2007-10-24 07:27 AM

Sweet Video. You have to click on "Concept Car" and then "Movie" or something like that.

Nick Koan 2007-10-24 08:24 AM

Hah, so I missed it the first time around, but the center dash is going to be programmed by Polyphony Digital?

I guess that means this car will never get to race against a Ferrari and can bounce off guard rails without damage.

Kevin M 2007-10-24 08:28 AM

And you get free unlimited supply of ultra-sticky tires for a small fee!

cody 2007-10-24 08:52 AM

That display is frickin' sweet though.

Nick Koan 2007-10-24 09:06 AM

It really is, and I actually think its pretty cool. I was just poking fun at the Gran Turismo series :p

cody 2007-10-24 02:51 PM

From Nissan's site:

THE ENGINE POWER OUTPUT VALUES INDICATED IN THIS CATALOG ARE ALL NET POWER OUTPUT VALUES !!!

NET VALUES ARE ESTIMATIONS OF WHEN THE ENGINE IS ASSEMBLED ON THE VEHICLE. FOR ESTIMATIONS OF THE SAME GASOLINE ENGINE, NET VALUES ARE APPROXIMATELY 15 % LOWER THAN "GROSS" VALUES ACCORDING TO JAMA RESEARCH.


480 net hp/ 85... x 100 = 564.70 hp.



564.7 hp./3.8 liters = 148.60 hp/liter

MPREZIV 2007-10-24 04:14 PM

NNA's recently launched site for the debut: www.gtrnissan.com

GC8.Love 2007-10-27 08:55 AM

I spent at least 20 minutes yesterday ranting with someone at work about this. For some people, it might be the car to end all cars.

cody 2007-10-27 11:25 AM

I presume it will do very well.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All Content Copyright Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras unless otherwise noted.