2004-01-15, 04:39 PM
|
#9
|
EJ207
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 3,707
Car: 2011 Chevy Battle Wagon
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtomicLabMonkey
Actually I don't think even this scenario is very realistic, for a couple reasons. If the front drive wheels hit a puddle and lose traction, shouldn't they start spinning faster than the rears which still have traction? Assuming the front wheels are dominating the center diff. and driving the VSS, it would cause the cruise to reduce throttle to control the rising speed input.
Second, even if you assume the original scenario above is plausible, if you're going 65mph that translates out to 1144 inches/second. Take an average wheelbase of 100 inches, and that means it only takes 0.0874 seconds to travel the distance of the wheelbase at that speed. That's well within the response time of a computer, but I don't think the entire electro-mechanical system that constitues a cruise control is going to have a response time near that, let alone have time to accelerate the car any meaningful amount before the rear tires also hit the puddle, which leaves you with no tires with any traction, and no possible acceleration.
|
Whoa. I couldn't even imagined trying to figure that out. :shock:
__________________
Captain Murphy: I dub thee Sir Phobos, Knight of Mars, beater of ass. Be a hitter, babe.
|
|
|