View Single Post
Old 2005-04-19, 10:07 AM   #26
ScottyS
EJ205
 
ScottyS's Avatar
 
Real Name: It is real!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: RNO
Posts: 2,367
 
Car: 1998 Impreza Wagon, 1991 Legacy Turbo Sedan, 2003 Nissan Xterra
Class: tvFree
 
Yes, I'll fix it for you. Again.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sperry
I think you missed my point. If you can build equity faster than the market around you then sure, it's a benefit... but the cheaper houses build equity slower than the more expensive ones, so when it's time to cash in, you still can't afford to move!

Look at my roommate. His house as gone up in value like 80% in the last 10 months. However, he can't move because the cost of houses like his have all gone up that much.

You don't truely build equity until you own property that you're not living at. Paying a mortgage isn't much different than renting until you can afford to move to a new house and rent out the old one.

Also: here are my numbers on that calculator you posted

LINK

Assuming the market flattens out like I expect, I'll *lose* $64,000 in 5 years if I buy a $350,000 home.
And that, friends, is why I'm still in an apartment until I get a more stable, better-paying job (when? ). I figure the factors above, plus taxes and maintenence issues (time AND money) would exceed the bounds of my marginal salary and how I'm interested in spending my time. I'd end up losing in the long run. Now, I DO wish that I could have purchased some land down in Mono County 5 years ago for $12k/lot, when the same lots are selling today for $80k, but we all can't be in the right place at the right time with the right funds....
__________________
"Trend Number One is that people aren't getting any smarter."
Dogbert
ScottyS is offline   Reply With Quote