Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras - View Single Post

dknv · 2006-06-09, 05:12 PM

Wow. How many of us could be accused of the first point? How many of us could say we were having handling problems, and had a recent incident where we lost control of the car? I would suppose the lawsuit will put to the test, the degree to which they can prove there was a 'pre-existing' condition.

The other point about the track release, that "numerous pertinent facts were concealed from Rudl and he therefore did not give an informed consent" - I could swear there is verbiage in the scca waiver, that it is our responsibility to understand the risks at the site, and it is our responsibility to not <edit> not sign the waiver if we are not comfortable with any perceived risks. So, what could they be referencing with 'numerous pertinent facts concealed'?

2006-06-09, 05:12 PM	#7
dknv EJ207 Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: 39n53, 119w90 Posts: 2,698 Car: RX-8 Class: CS maybe	Wow. How many of us could be accused of the first point? How many of us could say we were having handling problems, and had a recent incident where we lost control of the car? I would suppose the lawsuit will put to the test, the degree to which they can prove there was a 'pre-existing' condition. The other point about the track release, that "numerous pertinent facts were concealed from Rudl and he therefore did not give an informed consent" - I could swear there is verbiage in the scca waiver, that it is our responsibility to understand the risks at the site, and it is our responsibility to not <edit> not sign the waiver if we are not comfortable with any perceived risks. So, what could they be referencing with 'numerous pertinent facts concealed'? Last edited by dknv; 2006-06-09 at 05:16 PM.