Thread: springs
View Single Post
Old 2006-09-27, 02:40 PM   #22
M3n2c3
EJ205
 
M3n2c3's Avatar
 
Real Name: Jeremiah
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 1,888
 
Car: Current: 2014 Forester 2.5i Premium. Old: 2005 Impreza 2.5RS, 2000 Forester L
Class: RNP, long ago (see motto)
 
"Kids are ruining autocross."
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sperry
Sounds like the problem isn't with the topmounts, but with trying to use stock struts. i.e. coilovers for an '04 STI could work on a GC... as long as the topmounts fit the bolt pattern, and the lowers match the knuckles, you *can* install 'em on a GC as well. Whether or not that application is ideal is certainly up for discussion.
Fo' sho'. Although, that's outside the realm of this thread, I think. I just wanted to make sure that he didn't go and buy a set of 02/03 topmounts thinking everything would fit up a-ok.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
That's less of an issue than you think. It just means that the RS will sit slightly higher and have slightly stiffer effective spring rates- neither is really a bad thing. The potential issue comes from free length vs. compressed length, but the higher rates the springs have, the less of a difference it makes.
True, but how much higher? Based on how much my springs sag when I add 200 lbs of junk to the back of my car, I have a feeling he could end up with a ride height that totally negates the point of "lowering" springs. Perhaps it would be minimal, though. I can't really do the math on that one.

Anyway, I don't really have enough specific knowledge on the differences between the two chassis' suspensions to debate it much further. All I know is that I know enough to never try what's being discussed here myself.
__________________
Small red text that looks curious at first glance but is ultimately inconsequential

Last edited by M3n2c3; 2006-09-27 at 02:48 PM.
M3n2c3 is offline   Reply With Quote