Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras - View Single Post

Bob Danger · 2006-11-23, 03:46 PM

I already decided against it, its not worth the 8% increase in speed from lock to lock.

The SR5 was a model, it was the base line corolla for those years. It's like comparing the WRX and the STI they are both Impreza's. The SR5 had a single cam 4A-C, no LSD, rear drum brakes, and a manual rack. It made about 100hp. Whereas the GT-S has the Twim Cam 4A-G, a LSD, disc brakes on all four corners, and power assisted rack and pinion.

2006-11-23, 03:46 PM	#6
Bob Danger Tape Terrorist Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Melmac Posts: 1,792 Car: ? Class: Retired! Warning: Prolonged eye contact may cause insanity	I already decided against it, its not worth the 8% increase in speed from lock to lock. The SR5 was a model, it was the base line corolla for those years. It's like comparing the WRX and the STI they are both Impreza's. The SR5 had a single cam 4A-C, no LSD, rear drum brakes, and a manual rack. It made about 100hp. Whereas the GT-S has the Twim Cam 4A-G, a LSD, disc brakes on all four corners, and power assisted rack and pinion. __________________ A fronte praecipitium a tergo lupi. Last edited by Bob Danger; 2006-11-23 at 04:27 PM.