Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sperry
Shock data's gonna be useless for me, since I don't understand it, nor do I have the info for the car's current setup to compare it too, even if I learned more about it.
|
No data is useless, dude. Shock dyno plots are really easy to understand, and even if you don't have a use for it now, you might want it a few months or years from now. Better to see if you can get it while you still have some leverage (i.e. haven't dropped the cash yet). I didn't have any data for my Mustang's OEM shocks either, but I sure do like having the info for the Bilstein's I have on it now - it's a baseline for everything you do from now on.
Quote:
|
...However, for like $200 I can always revalve, and most 2.5" springs will fit on these struts so I'm not locked into the more expensive springs from JIC. The best that I can tell these will be damn good from the factory for what I'm looking for, and if they're not it won't be outragiously expensive to tweak them once I have a baseline idea of what I need for SM.
|
This is where *having* all the data you can get your hands on is a *big* benefit. Being able to tell the factory you want "more low-speed compression resistance & stiffer high-speed rebound" from the fronts, and being able to draw them a picture on a plot like the one above will actually get you what you want from the shock, unlike just telling them "umm, I think I want it stiffer" - cause then you don't know what you're going to get. At $200 a pop, it's better to get it right the first time. I'm thinking about having my rear shocks revalved stiffer in the coming months, and it's gonna be real easy to tell them exactly what I want cause you can see exactly what the current ones are doing as a baseline.