1) You are a crackhead... three rambling, blubbering posts in a row.
2) You may have read the article, but you certainly don't understand it. I specifically said, "Read it carefully". Your comments indicate you blew over it, and didn't bother to comprehend what's written in there. This especially shows your incompetents regarding the topic:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by crackhead
It also has a lot of wrong stuff in there things like 'if your traction will only permit 100 ft lbs of torque to be put down with out wheel spin the engine never produces more than 100 ft lbs of torque. Wow that's so wrong i don't know where to begin. If that's how physics worked no one would ever spin their wheels because as in that explation your motor can't produce more power than your wheels can put down (WRONG!!!!)
|
Of course the motor makes over 100ftlbs, that's what causes wheelspin. If you actually read the article, you'd understand that the example cases are to demonstrate torque
distribution (which had nothing to do with changing the ratio of the torque split) without the wheels slipping. If the motor were making more than 100ftlbs, the wheels would slip, and the torque at each end would instantly revert to the fixed 35/65 ratio instead of applying torque to the wheels with grip.
3) THE CENTER DIFF USES A PLANETARY GEAR. THE RATIO IS FIXED. NO AMOUNT OF LOCKING OF A CLUTCH CAN CHANGE THE NUMBER OF TEETH IN THE GEAR. This of it this way: if the motor makes a maximum of 300ftlbs of torque, you will *never* get more than 105ftlbs to the front wheels and never more than 195ftlbs to the rear wheels. When traction is limited, you can distribute the power to the wheels with more traction via the DCCD clutches, but not in a manner that exceeds the fixed ratio of the diff. That DCCD knob
does not make the car into a rear-wheel drive car, the ratio is FIXED at 35/65. Period.
4) Go read the article again. And again. And 5 more times. Until you understand it. Then come back here and talk shit to me again.