![]() |
|
Motorsports Chat Autocross, rallycross, and track event planning, as well as general motorsport discussion. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Señor Cheap Bastarde
Real Name: Dean Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
|
![]()
I just sent the following to the RenoSCCA Mailing list for those of you not on it...
2 years ago, I did the math between ST and the corresponding SP classes and found that the actual difference was over 2.5 Seconds per minute. There is much speculation that the difference has diminished. Attached you will find a spreadsheet comparing the ST and SP classes again. I have included the fastest car in each class, and similar or identical cars in the trophies at the 2006 Solo Nationals. I only included normally aspirated cars as forced induction cars in SP are permitted additional boost. Please note that the difference classes include AWD, low HP and high HP RWD cars. As you will see, the difference has not decreased, and may well have increased. For STS-DSP it is just shy of 2&3/4 seconds per 60 seconds. For STU-BSP it is actually over 3 seconds per 60 seconds. For STS2-CSP, it is off the charts. You may say that is because of the model years for the Miatas. While I agree, I also included the CS Miata numbers and with our current 2 seconds per 60 second .968 modifier, the STS2 Miatas just barely beat the CS Miatas. Feel free to go over the numbers yourself, but I think they are pretty convincing that our current modifier remains very conservative compared to to the data. If our intent is to allow ST and R tire cars to compete fairly in the same class, we may well want to increase the ST modifier to 2.5 seconds per 60 seconds. The data certainly supports that in my opinion.
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EJ207
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: 39n53, 119w90
Posts: 2,698
Car: RX-8
Class: CS maybe
|
![]()
I'm going to have to sit down for a bit of time to study the data so that I can better understand what you are talking about. However, I did want to caution that inferring the data is correct based on 2006 Nationals results, is going to result in a flawed evidence base. The new site, compounded by some numbers of drivers changing their tire choice at the last minute due to the surface characteristics, and several other factors I don't have the energy right now to record, may or may not have skewed the data. (Even the participants who WERE there can't agree that there is one, or two, or how many factors there were affecting results. The one thing most can agree on, is that results were unexpected, unpredictable, disparate.)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Señor Cheap Bastarde
Real Name: Dean Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
|
![]()
Data is data. At least we have some. Is it perfect, no... Is it better than nothing, probably. If nothing else, it reinforces the data from 2 years ago from the crappy concrete surface.
There has been one major change in R compounds since then, and one in ST really, so a wash makes sense to me. I am not strongly advocating going to 2.5 seconds, but it should give the grumblers something to think about. Get most of SECCS to show up for a club meeting and you could probably get it passed though . ![]() And on weather conditions, etc. I just sent the following to the list as well... __________________________________________________ _____________ Some people have asked if weather could have played a role or skewed these numbers. Yes, it could have, but for the most part it says the gap is even bigger. For the Miatas and BMWs, the R compounds ran when cold, and Street Tires when it was warmer, and they were still behind by those margins. There was no measurable precipitation for any run group according to the weather source I have. Fortunately, all the pairs ran on the same days. Times are at approximately the second half of their run group based on 2 hour run groups starting at 8:00 am each day. BSP: Tues. East Heat 1= 56 degrees@9:00, Wed. West Heat 1 = 61 degrees@9:00 STU: Tues. West Heat 2= 69 degrees @11:00, Wed. East Heat 2 = 66 degrees @11:00 13 & 5 degrees warmer for ST, and still slower by over 3 seconds per 60. CSP: Thur. West Heat 1= 49 degrees@9:00, Fri. East Heat 1 = 55 degrees@9:00 STS-2: Thur. East Heat 3= 57 degrees @1:00, Fri. West Heat 3 = 66 degrees @1:00 8 & 11 degrees warmer for ST, and still slower by well over 5 seconds per 60. In DSP vs. STS the weather does slightly favor Race Tires. DSP: Thur. East Heat 2= 66 degrees@11:00, Fri. West Heat 2 = 59 degrees@11:00 STS: Thur. East Heat 4= 69 degrees @3:00, Fri. West Heat 4 = 70 degrees @3:00 3 & 11 degrees warmer for R, but ST still slower by well over 2.5 seconds per 60. If you would like to look at humidity and other weather factors, feel free to check to this site for historical weather data for Topeka. http://www.wunderground.com/history/...q_statename=NA
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Street Tire Modifier | Joeyy | Motorsports Chat | 31 | 2006-09-14 03:17 PM |
Reno SCCA Street Tire changes | MattR | Motorsports Chat | 14 | 2005-12-27 03:35 PM |
How to figure out your autocross class in a Subaru | Kevin M | Motorsports Chat | 5 | 2005-04-29 08:24 AM |
What class am I??? | khail19 | Motorsports Chat | 14 | 2005-04-28 01:35 PM |
2005 PAX factors | Kevin M | Motorsports Chat | 38 | 2005-04-27 10:35 AM |