Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras  

Go Back   Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras > Off Topic Forums > Off Topic Chat

Off Topic Chat Talk about life in general...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2012-12-21, 10:41 AM   #1
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default Cory, and the rest of you guys, talk to me about the 6.0L Ford SuperDuty

Since we had the baby, my wife and I have been tossing around the idea of selling her Outback sedan and picking up a crossover with a little more space... like a CX-5 or something. However, my wife just suggested that she keep her car and replace our truck instead.

First off, I love my truck... it's a 2001 F-250 diesel extended-cab long-bed. It's basically ideal for what we use it for: picking up crap at Lowes, helping people move, and towing the car to/from the track. It's not fancy or anything, but it's plenty comfy for how infrequently it's used. Also, it's been super reliable, it's got super low mileage, and it's paid off. The one single thing that sucks about it: we can't put a baby seat in it because the jump-seats in the back are too small. So if we ever need to go somewhere together with the truck... we have to take two cars.

So, the suggestion from my wife is that I look into trading the truck in for a newer F250/F350 with a crew-cab. Now, I could try to find another of the same generation with the 7.3L diesel, but the chances that there are any in the same great shape as my truck, or with the same low mileage is pretty low. The obvious choice is to grab a 2008 or newer with the sweet 6.4L motor, but those are all in the $30k-$40k range. So, I'm thinking about picking up a 2006+/- 6.0L F250, even though those 6.0L motors are absolutely notorious for failing.

My question is whether or not any of you guys have 1st hand experience with the 6.0L, what to look for when shopping, what it takes to make these things reliable, etc. I know that the big killer of these things is heat. Apparently the oil cooler is built into the block and is cooled by the engine coolant. But that cooler tends to clog up and eventually the motor goes blammo. The other big issue is the EGR cooler, which also uses engine coolant to cool the exhaust, and tends to corrode and fail. Finally, the FICM power supply takes a dump on a regular basis, and apparently there's some reason to swap the head studs out for ARPs. There are companies that make upgrades to address all these issues, but it's like $5000 in parts to fully bulletproof the motor, not including the labor to install it all. Cory, have you ever done that work? Any idea how hard it is to do without pulling the cab?

Now, if I could find a 6.0L truck that's in good shape for under $20k, and then throw $5k at it to fix it up, I could justify going with that generation truck. I'm just not sure how to know I'm buying a truck that's in good shape, or how hard/expensive the upgrades really are to make it reliable. And if I need to spend more than $25k on a 6.0L, it seems like I should just suck it up and spend $30k for a 2008, since in addition to getting a much more reliable motor, the rest of the truck is much nicer as well.

Any advice? Also, anyone looking for a nice no-frills diesel pickup?
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-21, 11:41 AM   #2
MikeK
Captain Turbo
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Reno
Posts: 3,318
 
Car: 05 STi
Default

Get an F650. It has room for a child seat.
MikeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-21, 12:13 PM   #3
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeK View Post
Get an F650. It has room for a child seat.


Actually, I really like having the long bed so I can fit 8' lumber in the back with the tailgate up. But a crew-cab long-bed is basically the longest truck there is. The only thing bigger is a crew-cab dually... and that's not longer, just wider. so, I think we're going to look for a crew-cab short-bed... which sucks for carrying lumber, but at least it's no longer than my current truck, which is already a PITA to park anywhere.
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-21, 12:22 PM   #4
ScottyS
EJ205
 
ScottyS's Avatar
 
Real Name: It is real!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: RNO
Posts: 2,367
 
Car: 1998 Impreza Wagon, 1991 Legacy Turbo Sedan, 2003 Nissan Xterra
Class: tvFree
 
Yes, I'll fix it for you. Again.
Default

Also, look at the fuel mileage for various models. I can tell you that the 2009 4WD F350 Crew and Caravan shell that I use for fieldwork gets HORRIBLE mileage, as in 12 mpg to Ely and back. I've made this trip many times, and rarely is it better than that. And when my friend with an extra long and tall 2WD Sprinter tells me that he's getting ~25 mpg with the Mercedes motor, I almost cry.
__________________
"Trend Number One is that people aren't getting any smarter."
Dogbert
ScottyS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-21, 12:32 PM   #5
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottyS View Post
Also, look at the fuel mileage for various models. I can tell you that the 2009 4WD F350 Crew and Caravan shell that I use for fieldwork gets HORRIBLE mileage, as in 12 mpg to Ely and back. I've made this trip many times, and rarely is it better than that. And when my friend with an extra long and tall 2WD Sprinter tells me that he's getting ~25 mpg with the Mercedes motor, I almost cry.
I'm actually not too concerned with fuel mileage. My current truck gets in the 13-16 mpg range (around town and towing... a little better on a long drive w/o the trailer). Pretty much anything in the double digits is fine, since we don't drive the truck all that often. I think we average like 4000 miles/year on the truck... 12 mpg wouldn't be the end of the world.

Plus it's not like there are lots of choices in diesel pickups. I don't want a Chevy, and I'd punch myself in the balls before I own a Dodge. No matter how awesome the Cumins/Allison combos are... they're still surrounded by a Dodge.
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-12-24, 12:01 AM   #6
MPREZIV
Token
 
MPREZIV's Avatar
 
Real Name: Le Stig Afrique?
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: sitting next to a big yellow box
Posts: 3,589
 
Car: 2001 Impreza 2.5 RS
Class: 05 TDSP
 
No, I won't work on your car. F* your car
Default

The only one of those jobs that I've done is the EGR repairs. It's a time consuming som-bitch, but not excessively difficult by any means.

As far as the others, unfortunately, if they require serious engine dis-assembly or removal, I don't think we've got the means to do it. I've heard of them, and how often they occur, but never done any of the repairs.

I know you said you don't want a Chevy, but I REALLY love my dad's Duramax...
__________________
"...these condoms have a topical anesthetic to reduce sensitivity, so you can last longer. What a paradox. You can't feel a thing, but you can f*ck for HOURS..."
MPREZIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-02, 09:57 AM   #7
rory_a
EJ251
 
rory_a's Avatar
 
Real Name: Rory
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 607
 
Car: Miata, shit.
Class: Out Classed
 
NOW WITH 100% LESS STI!
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sperry View Post
I don't want a Chevy, and I'd punch myself in the balls before I own a Dodge. No matter how awesome the Cumins/Allison combos are... they're still surrounded by a Dodge.
Isn't the Cummins/Allison combo incredibly rare, like a couple thousand produced in the 2004 or 2005 range? And most were likely all bought by light-duty haulers/transporters because of the added option cost, so mileage will likely be in the half million range (complete guess, but considering how many miles those guys rack up...)


Quote:
Originally Posted by MPREZIV View Post
I know you said you don't want a Chevy, but I REALLY love my dad's Duramax...
If it were me, I'd struggle to go with a Chevy/GMC simply because of the IFS. I know it's as strong, competent, etc., and apparentlyoffers a better ride (typically because the few I've ridden in/driven of each have been levelled or on a decent 6"), but I think I'd still have to go Ford/Dodge for the solid axle just cause. And despite my dad's 2005 Dodge 1500 (which was mine) holding up well, feeling solid as new, and mechanically sound at just under 100k, I'd probably have to go Ford because every other recent Dodge/Chrysler product is basically a piece of garbage aside from the four-door Rubi Wrangler and 2011+ Grand Cherokee - and neither of those are worth the money.
rory_a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-02, 12:19 PM   #8
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

IFS >>> solid axle for anything but high-articulation offroad stuff. For all the same reasons your Miata has IRS instead of a live axle.
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-02, 03:13 PM   #9
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

It almost doesn't matter since I prefer the Fords and they're like $3000 cheaper than the equivalent Chevy/Dodge.

The only reason to look at Chevy/Dodge is if I can find a nice low mileage '07 or something from the same year the Fords still had the 6.0L motors... but since they cost the same as an '08 Ford with the 6.4L motor, it still seems silly for me to consider them.
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-09, 11:34 AM   #10
AtomicLabMonkey
Nightwalker
 
AtomicLabMonkey's Avatar
 
Real Name: Austin
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oshkosh, WI
Posts: 4,063
 
Car: '13 WRX
 
YGBSM
Default

Solid axles suck, especially for off road use. That is all.
__________________
"None of you seem to understand. I'm not locked in here with you.. you're locked in here with me."
AtomicLabMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-09, 12:46 PM   #11
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AtomicLabMonkey View Post
Solid axles suck, especially for off road use. That is all.
I'm going to guess that what "off road" means to most people (a tiny jeep crawling over boulders with spotters, winches, and beers) is different from what "off road" means to you (an armored truck screaming across the desert at 70 mph with guns blazing).
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-09, 12:48 PM   #12
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

Also, I've expanded my truck search to include the newer ecoboost powered F150's.

On paper, they actually tow nearly the same as my 7.3L diesel does if you can find them properly equipped, drive much more comfortably when not towing, and they're much cheaper than similar era SuperDuties. They're just hard to find with a crew-cab, a 6.5' bed, and the max tow package.
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-09, 01:13 PM   #13
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

What about range when towing? I imagine the fuel economy isn't as good.
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-09, 01:23 PM   #14
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin M View Post
What about range when towing? I imagine the fuel economy isn't as good.
Meh, I don't care. I don't tow enough (load-wise and frequency-wise) for it to make a big difference.

In fact, that's perhaps the best reason to switch to gas... the premium I pay for the diesel motor doesn't pay me back fast enough in fuel mileage 'cause I tow like just 4 weekends a year. People are getting like 19 mpg in the F150s combined when they're not towing. I'm getting like 16 mpg in the F250. And diesel is more expensive these days than regular. So, even if the towing mileage is under 10, I'm probably still saving money.

That said... I'd still rather have a diesel. I've already paid up-front for the motor... I'm not sure "cashing out" on it is ever going to be worth it. And towing with the diesel is totally stress free. 90% of the time on the road, you can't even tell there's a trailer back there.
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-09, 04:57 PM   #15
Dean
Seņor Cheap Bastarde
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Real Name: Dean
Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
 
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
 
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
Default

I'd trade my gas 5L NA F150 for a turbo diesel any day almost regardless of gas price difference. Towing without torque is not fun especially up a grade at altitude with a heavy load.

Stick to diesel Scott!
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids...
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-09, 05:39 PM   #16
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean View Post
I'd trade my gas 5L NA F150 for a turbo diesel any day almost regardless of gas price difference. Towing without torque is not fun especially up a grade at altitude with a heavy load.

Stick to diesel Scott!
You realize that the twin turbo V6 ecoboost motor in the F150 make 420ftlbs of torque right? That's only 80 less than my diesel. It also makes 365 hp, which is quite a bit more than the 7.3L's 250 hp.

The F150 has a towing capacity of 11,100 lbs if you get the max towing package... which is just under the 12,500 of the SuperDuty. Considering I tow like 6,000 lbs at most... it's basically moot.

That ecoboost truck is kind of amazing.
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-09, 05:39 PM   #17
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

And that's stock. I bet stage 1 tunes on that thing are impressive.
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-09, 05:41 PM   #18
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

Who wants to help me put an ecoboost V6 in a Miata?
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-09, 08:03 PM   #19
MikeK
Captain Turbo
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Reno
Posts: 3,318
 
Car: 05 STi
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sperry View Post
Who wants to help me put an ecoboost V6 in a Miata?
In or on?
MikeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-09, 08:27 PM   #20
Nick Koan
JDM Cowboy
 
Nick Koan's Avatar
 
Real Name: Nick
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 8,642
 
Car: 2015 Mazda 3
Default

Heck, you've got a welder, why not two smallblock v8's instead?

__________________
While a standard engine is powered by a belt connected to the crankshaft, a turbo engine runs on its own exhaust steam, making it more energy efficient. -- CNN
Nick Koan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-09, 08:28 PM   #21
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sperry View Post
Who wants to help me put an ecoboost V6 in a Miata?
Cory, but only if we write it up and get it on the schedule before he hears about it.

__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-09, 09:14 PM   #22
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Koan View Post
Heck, you've got a welder, why not two smallblock v8's instead?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RP3VZ1l4qgU
If it's going to be that kinda party, why not put two Cummings turbo diesels, the turbine from an M1A2, and the first stage of a Saturn V in a Miata? Quit half-assing, Nick!
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-10, 08:17 AM   #23
Dean
Seņor Cheap Bastarde
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Real Name: Dean
Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
 
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
 
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sperry View Post
You realize that the twin turbo V6 ecoboost motor in the F150 make 420ftlbs of torque right? That's only 80 less than my diesel. It also makes 365 hp, which is quite a bit more than the 7.3L's 250 hp.

The F150 has a towing capacity of 11,100 lbs if you get the max towing package... which is just under the 12,500 of the SuperDuty. Considering I tow like 6,000 lbs at most... it's basically moot.

That ecoboost truck is kind of amazing.
I forgot about the new conventional gas turbos being available. My NA 5l is a wimpy gas guzzling POS.
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids...
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-10, 08:45 AM   #24
AtomicLabMonkey
Nightwalker
 
AtomicLabMonkey's Avatar
 
Real Name: Austin
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oshkosh, WI
Posts: 4,063
 
Car: '13 WRX
 
YGBSM
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sperry View Post
If it's going to be that kinda party..
..Imma stick mah dick in the mashed potatoes!
__________________
"None of you seem to understand. I'm not locked in here with you.. you're locked in here with me."
AtomicLabMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-01-10, 09:54 AM   #25
rory_a
EJ251
 
rory_a's Avatar
 
Real Name: Rory
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 607
 
Car: Miata, shit.
Class: Out Classed
 
NOW WITH 100% LESS STI!
Default

I just lost a post, so cliff notes - I bet you, and the family, would be happier with the F150 Eco Boost in the long run.
rory_a is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All Content Copyright Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras unless otherwise noted.