2005-07-06, 03:17 PM | #1 |
EJ251
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 513
|
Top Gear video *beware*
Dont get me wrong guys, you all know i love STi's and subaru's in general. so if you have a firm hate for evo's do NOT watch this video. but i do believe A true Enthusiast would enjoy watching the video. anyway, it's the first time i've ever seen it.
It's very interesting to see the difference in performance around the track side by side. That STi's got great color doesn't it? also, the JDM fog's look sick! let me know what you all think. http://media.racingflix.com/rfvids/r..._vs_WRXSti.wmv
__________________
I Can't Believe My Friends.... Drive WRX's.... |
2005-07-06, 06:04 PM | #2 |
EJ205
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 1,196
|
I always knew this site was full of little boys...
__________________
Turbo is a decent with modification. |
2005-07-06, 06:18 PM | #3 | |
JDM Cowboy
Real Name: Nick Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 8,642
Car: 2015 Mazda 3
|
Quote:
__________________
While a standard engine is powered by a belt connected to the crankshaft, a turbo engine runs on its own exhaust steam, making it more energy efficient. -- CNN |
|
2005-07-06, 08:18 PM | #4 | |
Tape Terrorist
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Melmac
Posts: 1,792
Car: ?
Class: Retired!
Warning: Prolonged eye contact may cause insanity
|
Quote:
__________________
A fronte praecipitium a tergo lupi. |
|
2005-07-06, 09:34 PM | #5 |
warehouse SECCS
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SoCal...
Posts: 6,253
Car: 04 Evo 99 Cadillac
Class: street de le mod
|
why won't this vid work for me.
|
2005-07-07, 11:29 PM | #6 | |
EJ205
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 1,196
|
Quote:
__________________
Turbo is a decent with modification. |
|
2005-07-09, 07:55 PM | #7 |
EJ205
Real Name: Tim Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 1,384
Car: '94 L
|
The link doesn't work me me either.
|
2005-07-11, 07:50 AM | #8 |
EJ205
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,354
Car: 2004 STi
Class: TSM
I can't complain
|
downloading now - 356kb
__________________
Cobb Stage 2 |
2005-07-11, 07:59 AM | #9 |
EJ205
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,354
Car: 2004 STi
Class: TSM
I can't complain
|
watched the vid........the only thing I can say is - have fun trying to get a FQ320 in the states....... oh and did you see the price difference between a reg. Evo VIII and the FQ320 model? I want to say thanks for showing me that the 50K plus car (not avalible here) can beat my 30K car
I guess if you want a mans car you must live in England.....
__________________
Cobb Stage 2 |
2005-07-11, 12:06 PM | #10 | |
The Doink
Real Name: Scott Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
The way out is through
|
Quote:
FQ320 = 30,000 UK Pounds = $52,700 US Dollars UK STi Spec-C = 27,500 UK Pounds = $48,300 US Dollars They're only about $4500 apart, not $20,000.
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints? |
|
2005-07-11, 01:04 PM | #11 |
EJ251
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sparks
Posts: 526
Car: 2005 2.5 rs cgm
Class: TDSP
|
In case anyone was wondering, "FQ" stands for fucking quick. Perdon le french. And even more obvious than that, 320 stands for the amount of horsepower. I was reading a Sport Compact Car rag a couple months back, and if I remember correctly, there is an even faster evo, like fq 400 or something like that.
__________________
Can anybody fly this thing? |
2005-07-11, 05:18 PM | #12 | |
The Doink
Real Name: Scott Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
The way out is through
|
Quote:
http://www.fastsaloons.com/carindex....order=0&man=14
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints? |
|
2005-07-12, 10:24 AM | #13 | |
EJ205
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,354
Car: 2004 STi
Class: TSM
I can't complain
|
Quote:
now in the clip they show the WR1 as only .6 sec faster then my STi, with this in mind I would save my cash and buy a USDM STi.............and save 20k
__________________
Cobb Stage 2 |
|
2005-07-12, 10:59 AM | #14 | |
The Doink
Real Name: Scott Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
The way out is through
|
Quote:
If the FQ320 was available in the US, it would be significantly cheaper than it is in the UK. Assuming the 35% price difference between the US Sti and the UK Spec-C carries over to the FQ320 if it were brought to the US, the FQ320 would cost approximately $34,200. Which is actually even less than the $4500 difference over the STi I already guessed. The bottom line: the FQ320 is serious bang for the buck... probably even more-so than the US STi. But I'd still rather have the 2.5L motor.
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints? |
|
2005-07-12, 11:37 AM | #15 | |||
EJ205
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,354
Car: 2004 STi
Class: TSM
I can't complain
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Cobb Stage 2 |
|||
2005-07-12, 12:06 PM | #16 | |||
The Doink
Real Name: Scott Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
The way out is through
|
Quote:
Quote:
So if you want to compare your US STi's bang-to-buck ratio vs. the UK's FQ320's bang-to-buck ratio, you have to compare apples-to-apples, which means either estimating the value of the US STi in the UK, or estimating the value of the FQ here in the States. Otherwise your comparison is worthless. FYI: the FQ320 *is* an EVO MR... just tuned. In the UK, the FQ300 (which is what I'd guess is closest to our EVO MR) goes for 28,000 UK pounds, which is about $49,800. The US EVO MR's MSRP is $34,700... which is about 30% cheaper than it's UK sister, and right in line with my previous estimates. Quote:
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints? |
|||
2005-07-12, 03:22 PM | #17 |
EJ205
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,354
Car: 2004 STi
Class: TSM
I can't complain
|
again thanks for the imput...........maybe you should have just watched the video
__________________
Cobb Stage 2 |
2005-07-12, 03:28 PM | #18 | |
JDM Cowboy
Real Name: Nick Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 8,642
Car: 2015 Mazda 3
|
Quote:
If you were in Britan, the USDM STi would be very expensive to import. Probably close to what either the FQ or the WR1 would cost (if not more). If you were in the US (like, of course, we are), then of course the FQ would be ridiculiously expensive. I don't know anyone that would import it here, pay the UK price plus the necessary import fees. That would be just plain stupid. Why not just get a USDM STi or EVO (MR or not). The FQ, relatively speeking of its destined market, is quite a good bang for the buck. (and yes, I did watch the video)
__________________
While a standard engine is powered by a belt connected to the crankshaft, a turbo engine runs on its own exhaust steam, making it more energy efficient. -- CNN Last edited by Nick Koan; 2005-07-12 at 03:31 PM. |
|
2005-07-12, 03:34 PM | #19 | |
The Doink
Real Name: Scott Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
The way out is through
|
Quote:
And there isn't a lick of information regarding price conversions and car values between the US and UK, and therefore has zero impact on our discussion, aside from being the genesis of your statement that the STi has a higher performance to value ratio.
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints? |
|
2005-07-12, 08:58 PM | #20 |
EJ251
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 513
|
haha it's funny. all i wanted to do was show a cool video. dont need to go freaking out.. both are great cars and let just say, the SAME type of tests were done in the UNITED STATES on both USDM cars. the STi still had the understeer and the Evo was slower in straight line speed. and here we're talking almost no price difference. I think a more fair comparison would have been teh STi spec C.. but it costs more.. i only say that because money seems to be a heated topic of debate here. anyway, i like both cars alot and have read enough magazines that have tried to prove that one is better than the other..
__________________
I Can't Believe My Friends.... Drive WRX's.... |
2005-07-12, 09:02 PM | #21 |
warehouse SECCS
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SoCal...
Posts: 6,253
Car: 04 Evo 99 Cadillac
Class: street de le mod
|
I don't know about freaking out.
Just a little conversation! |
2005-07-12, 10:09 PM | #22 |
Captain Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Reno
Posts: 3,318
Car: 05 STi
|
Tyson stop freaking out
|
2005-07-12, 10:33 PM | #23 | |
El Matador
Real Name: Matt Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 10,660
Car: 2012 Toyota Tacoma
Class: ?
|
Quote:
__________________
"Dallas..We have a problem.” |
|
2005-07-13, 07:21 AM | #24 |
EJ205
Real Name: Tim Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 1,384
Car: '94 L
|
Candybars
|
2005-07-13, 08:12 AM | #25 |
EJ205
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,354
Car: 2004 STi
Class: TSM
I can't complain
|
lap times:
Evo FQ320 - 1:26 Evo FQ300 - 1:28.9 WRX STi WR1 -1:29.4 USDM WRX STi - 1:30.1
__________________
Cobb Stage 2 |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Top Gear winter olympics | Nick Koan | Off Topic Chat | 18 | 2006-02-20 03:32 PM |
Worst birthday ever. | Kevin M | Off Topic Chat | 44 | 2004-12-10 02:20 PM |
5th Gear on Speed | Kevin M | General Subaru Discussion & Club Chat | 2 | 2004-07-03 09:15 PM |
2003 USTCC Cali Speedway In-Car Video on DVD | GarySheehan | Motorsports Chat | 1 | 2003-10-31 01:18 PM |