Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras  

Go Back   Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras > Car Enthusiast Forums > General Subaru Discussion & Club Chat

General Subaru Discussion & Club Chat Talk about Subarus, plan meets, and other Sierra Nevada area Suby stuff!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2011-03-20, 01:10 PM   #1
SpenceTi
EJ18
 
SpenceTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 34
 
Car: 07 Stage 2 WRX
Class: ESP
 
slow in fast out
Default Buying advice...

Hey guys, I haven't been on the site ever since my dad sold the sti a few years ago. Some of you might know me from 3-4 years ago when you all used to meet at bullys. I was sort of an on-looker with my dad since I wasn't the one with the car but I have learned alot about them since then. At one point I was driving the STi almost daily so I can handle myself with a quick car un-like most people my age...

Basically I finally figure it's time to pick up a subaru of my own that I can track and autocross. I have been looking mainly in the 02-05 range. I am at a major toss up between getting an sti or getting a wrx. The price and availability of sti's is what I am most held back by. Also it won't be left stock, so if I did get a wrx most everything suspension wise would be addressed.

So what do you guys think? I am looking for a DD/Weekend Warrior. I love hatches but they are hard to find.
__________________
"Slow is the new fast"
SpenceTi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-20, 02:32 PM   #2
Dean
Seņor Cheap Bastarde
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Real Name: Dean
Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
 
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
 
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
Default

I would vote '05+ STI if you can afford it and drive it mostly stock for a year before making many mods.

a 2.5l WRX might be a good option for less $s, but if you plan to track it at all brake and transmission upgrades will quickly eat the $ delta to an STI.

If you are budgeting for Mods, keep a short block with Forged internals on the list because the stock internals will break eventually and not planning for it will be a big budget shock/breaker.
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids...
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-20, 02:37 PM   #3
SpenceTi
EJ18
 
SpenceTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 34
 
Car: 07 Stage 2 WRX
Class: ESP
 
slow in fast out
Default

Yeah just seems like the premium for STI's insurance and sale price are the real shocker. So you wouldn't recommend a 02-03 bugeye for a starter DD and Auto-x'er?

It won't be track as much, maybe once or twice a year but auto x every event most likely. I have an idea of what I want to do first though, sways and some stiffer springs to keep everything tidy bod roll wise.
__________________
"Slow is the new fast"
SpenceTi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-20, 03:05 PM   #4
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

If you end up going with a WRX, don't do any major mods to it. Stick to bolt-on suspension stuff, Stage 2 on the engine, and maybe brakes. Making a WRX the performance and reliability equal of an STi costs more than buying one up front, so don't try to get too grand with it.

For what you want to do, an STi is clearly what you're looking for, but the entry price issue is understandable. Just use a WRX as a bridge to getting there when you can afford it in a few years.
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-20, 03:10 PM   #5
SpenceTi
EJ18
 
SpenceTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 34
 
Car: 07 Stage 2 WRX
Class: ESP
 
slow in fast out
Default

I wouldnt dump money into a wrx for alot of reasons... I realized that for how much sti's are above wrx's, in the long run it would pay off to eat the extra 50 bucks or so a month and commit to an sti. As far as years, would 04 be a no no? 05 and 06 seem like my options.
__________________
"Slow is the new fast"
SpenceTi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-20, 03:20 PM   #6
Dean
Seņor Cheap Bastarde
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Real Name: Dean
Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
 
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
 
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
Default

There is nothing wrong with a 2l WRX or an '04 STI if that is what you have the budget for. I beat the snot out of an '02 WRX for years.

Spend less than you can afford would be my suggestion and save the extra for repairs or nestegg for the next purchase.

Only minor issues with the '04 STI, which I have, is the front wheel bearings and wheel clearance/sizes/options. The price difference is not typically much for the same mileage which is why I said '05+.
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids...
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-20, 03:51 PM   #7
SpenceTi
EJ18
 
SpenceTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 34
 
Car: 07 Stage 2 WRX
Class: ESP
 
slow in fast out
Default

I see what you mean. I will have to check into my bank and credit unions to see what I can handle for an sti vs wrx.

As for issues, what mileage would be too high? I am coming from the other side of the spectrum (rock crawling jeep) where mileage can be anything really. What should I except to go wrong?
__________________
"Slow is the new fast"
SpenceTi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-20, 04:26 PM   #8
Dean
Seņor Cheap Bastarde
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Real Name: Dean
Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
 
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
 
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
Default

In general, any Subaru forced induction engine can expect to need a rebuild between 100-150K or sooner if modded.

Front wheel bearings on anything but an '05+ STI fail somewhere along the line. Nissan bearing replacement with good grease lasts longer. 5MTs may fail if you beat them or last forever if you are nice to them. Struts wear out.

If you plan for $1000/year maintenance above oil & such you are probably pretty well off when stuff goes wrong. They really are pretty damn reliable.
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids...

Last edited by Dean; 2011-03-20 at 04:29 PM.
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-20, 05:26 PM   #9
SpenceTi
EJ18
 
SpenceTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 34
 
Car: 07 Stage 2 WRX
Class: ESP
 
slow in fast out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean View Post
In general, any Subaru forced induction engine can expect to need a rebuild between 100-150K or sooner if modded.

Front wheel bearings on anything but an '05+ STI fail somewhere along the line. Nissan bearing replacement with good grease lasts longer. 5MTs may fail if you beat them or last forever if you are nice to them. Struts wear out.

If you plan for $1000/year maintenance above oil & such you are probably pretty well off when stuff goes wrong. They really are pretty damn reliable.
That's another thing for me is the 5MT, having that 6th gear would just be much more cherry for highway driving.
__________________
"Slow is the new fast"
SpenceTi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-20, 08:48 PM   #10
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

Actually, 6th gear in an STi is about the same as 5th in a WRX.
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-20, 09:10 PM   #11
Dean
Seņor Cheap Bastarde
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Real Name: Dean
Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
 
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
 
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin M View Post
Actually, 6th gear in an STi is about the same as 5th in a WRX.
That is totally untrue. The STi cruises at least 3-400RPM lower in top gear. Might be more like 500 but it has been a while since I road tripped with Sue and compared.
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids...
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-20, 09:50 PM   #12
SpenceTi
EJ18
 
SpenceTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 34
 
Car: 07 Stage 2 WRX
Class: ESP
 
slow in fast out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin M View Post
Actually, 6th gear in an STi is about the same as 5th in a WRX.
If this was true that would help me decide quite a bit...
__________________
"Slow is the new fast"
SpenceTi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-20, 10:29 PM   #13
Dean
Seņor Cheap Bastarde
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Real Name: Dean
Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
 
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
 
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
Default

2002 WRX:
Gear Ratios
1 : 3.454:1
2 : 1.947:1
3 : 1.366:1
4 : 0.972:1
5 : 0.738:1
Final drive : 3.9:1

2004 STI:
1st: 3.636
2nd: 2.375
3rd: 1.761
4th:1.346
5th:0.971
6th: 0.756
Final drive : 3.9:1

So My STI is 2.4% higher ratio than my WRX was if I have the right ratios and did the math right, so I was high in my estimate. Still, That should be 72RPM at 3000RPM and basically 100 at 4000. Doesn't seem like much but I sure noticed the drop when I changed cars. The WRX just sounded like it was whining down the road at 70+.

What is interesting is how 5MT 4th is almost identical to 6MT 3rd.
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids...

Last edited by Dean; 2011-03-20 at 10:37 PM.
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-21, 07:34 AM   #14
SpenceTi
EJ18
 
SpenceTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 34
 
Car: 07 Stage 2 WRX
Class: ESP
 
slow in fast out
Default

Doesn't seem like a huge difference...

On our 07 we has kw v3's and some big sways. I liked how it handled but it got brutal on streets sometimes. Would some decent struts and springs be okay?
__________________
"Slow is the new fast"
SpenceTi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-21, 08:50 AM   #15
renosubby
RIP
 
Real Name: Cory Schander
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 163
 
Car: 2006 STI
Class: SM
 
Never dwell on the past, It fucks your future!
Default

what is your price range
__________________
MAYHEM TUNING
2006 CGM STI
570WHP
539WTQ
10.6 At 136MPH Sacramento
renosubby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-21, 09:56 AM   #16
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean View Post
2002 WRX:
Gear Ratios
1 : 3.454:1
2 : 1.947:1
3 : 1.366:1
4 : 0.972:1
5 : 0.738:1
Final drive : 3.9:1

2004 STI:
1st: 3.636
2nd: 2.375
3rd: 1.761
4th:1.346
5th:0.971
6th: 0.756
Final drive : 3.9:1

So My STI is 2.4% higher ratio than my WRX was if I have the right ratios and did the math right, so I was high in my estimate. Still, That should be 72RPM at 3000RPM and basically 100 at 4000. Doesn't seem like much but I sure noticed the drop when I changed cars. The WRX just sounded like it was whining down the road at 70+.

What is interesting is how 5MT 4th is almost identical to 6MT 3rd.
Huh?

Since when is 0.972:1 "almost identical" to 1.761:1?

Did you mean the 5MT's 4th compared to the 6MT's 5th? 'Cause that's the whole point of the 6MT... is was *never* related to fuel savings while cruising... the top 2 gears in both boxes are supposed to be nearly the same.

The 6MT adds an extra gear down low to allow you to stay in the boost better when rallying under 100mph. The point of the 6MT is to add acceleration on the low end, not fuel savings on the top end.
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-21, 10:04 AM   #17
SpenceTi
EJ18
 
SpenceTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 34
 
Car: 07 Stage 2 WRX
Class: ESP
 
slow in fast out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by renosubby View Post
what is your price range
It all depends, but i'd like to go below 20k
__________________
"Slow is the new fast"
SpenceTi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-21, 12:59 PM   #18
cody
Candy Mountain
 
cody's Avatar
 
Real Name: Cody
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Posts: 7,751
 
Car: 03 Pussy Wagon, now with more pink!
Class: TESP
 
OMG Internet!
Default

Bought my bugeye new. Went Stage II with custom tune at around 60K miles. I now have 130K miles on it. It's been nothing but dependable. I've had one front and one rear wheel bearing go out on me. That's about it for failures though. The turbo inlet pipe was my fault. I've autocrossed it for 5 years. I got 2nd place in PAX last year and sometimes I even beat similarly moded STi's in raw time (that's a new development as of last year though).

Love everything about my car including the gas milage. 2.0 L FTW. Make sure you get one manufactured in late 2002 (MY 03) or after so you get the stronger gears.

I've had the following suspension setups and though my current one is the best with regard to comfort and performance, they were all great.

1st Eibach Prokit Springs (wagon specific FWIW (nothing)) with KYB AGX struts - Ok
2nd Crucial Springs with KYB AGX struts - noticeably better
3rd Crucial Springs with Koni Yellow inserts in wagon doner struts - the best
__________________
Slow and low, that is the tempo.
cody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-21, 04:14 PM   #19
100_Percent_Juice
(40 percent vodka)
 
100_Percent_Juice's Avatar
 
Real Name: Joel
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 4,446
 
Car: 2004WRX
Class: Baby-Hauler/GroceryGetter
Default

Just buy my car.
__________________
"A power nap is when you sleep on someone who is weaker than you." - Dimitri Martin
100_Percent_Juice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-21, 04:16 PM   #20
SpenceTi
EJ18
 
SpenceTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 34
 
Car: 07 Stage 2 WRX
Class: ESP
 
slow in fast out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cody View Post
Bought my bugeye new. Went Stage II with custom tune at around 60K miles. I now have 130K miles on it. It's been nothing but dependable. I've had one front and one rear wheel bearing go out on me. That's about it for failures though. The turbo inlet pipe was my fault. I've autocrossed it for 5 years. I got 2nd place in PAX last year and sometimes I even beat similarly moded STi's in raw time (that's a new development as of last year though).

Love everything about my car including the gas milage. 2.0 L FTW. Make sure you get one manufactured in late 2002 (MY 03) or after so you get the stronger gears.

I've had the following suspension setups and though my current one is the best with regard to comfort and performance, they were all great.

1st Eibach Prokit Springs (wagon specific FWIW (nothing)) with KYB AGX struts - Ok
2nd Crucial Springs with KYB AGX struts - noticeably better
3rd Crucial Springs with Koni Yellow inserts in wagon doner struts - the best

This is honestly exactly what I want to hear. Thanks for a good post mang.

So your saying that 2.5 v 2.0 it would work better to have the 2.0 for DD duty?
__________________
"Slow is the new fast"
SpenceTi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-21, 05:18 PM   #21
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

Hahaha, no way. Cody is very, very diligent about maintenance, he studies potential mods very carefully and frankly, he's had good luck. Unless you can buy a car with a background as good as his, don't count on having a worry-free 2.0 liter. There's really no advantage to them other than a slight gas mileage advantage (and I mean slight, less than 10% at regular cruise in most cases).
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-21, 05:28 PM   #22
cody
Candy Mountain
 
cody's Avatar
 
Real Name: Cody
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Posts: 7,751
 
Car: 03 Pussy Wagon, now with more pink!
Class: TESP
 
OMG Internet!
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin M View Post
Hahaha, no way. Cody is very, very diligent about maintenance, he studies potential mods very carefully and frankly, he's had good luck. Unless you can buy a car with a background as good as his, don't count on having a worry-free 2.0 liter. There's really no advantage to them other than a slight gas mileage advantage (and I mean slight, less than 10% at regular cruise in most cases).
I don't disagree with any of this, except that the 2.5L is much more prone to ringland (piston) failure due to knock. This means a really good conservative tune becomes even more important with a 2.5L than it is with the 2L.
__________________
Slow and low, that is the tempo.
cody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-21, 05:33 PM   #23
cody
Candy Mountain
 
cody's Avatar
 
Real Name: Cody
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Posts: 7,751
 
Car: 03 Pussy Wagon, now with more pink!
Class: TESP
 
OMG Internet!
Default

If you can swing it, get the STi. There's an extremely long list of people that bought, modified, and then took a big loss on a WRX so they could buy an STi. The 2.5L is worth it for the extra power and the 6 speed is bullet proof just in case you decide to every go big. You can make a WRX faster than a stock STi easily and cheaply, but once you factor in the brakes, drivetrain, and other minor upgrades, the STi makes more sense for anyone thinking of modifying and/or racing a Subaru.

Unfortunately most older WRX's have been beat on. But if you could find one that has been properly driven and cared for, and don't go beyond stage II, you should be set for less money than an STi.
__________________
Slow and low, that is the tempo.

Last edited by cody; 2011-03-21 at 05:38 PM.
cody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-21, 06:34 PM   #24
SpenceTi
EJ18
 
SpenceTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 34
 
Car: 07 Stage 2 WRX
Class: ESP
 
slow in fast out
Default

I hear ya.

I met up with rory today and looked at his 07 wrx wagon and loved it. So if all goes well I will have it by the weekend
__________________
"Slow is the new fast"
SpenceTi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-03-21, 07:19 PM   #25
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

Nice!
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shopping for a pre '02 Impreza, any advice?? WRXlerate Off Topic Chat 12 2009-08-05 08:33 PM
Buying an iPod or Zune MP3, Help! Tahoe C5 Off Topic Chat 8 2008-07-07 11:43 PM
Suspension Advice ddub Technical Chat 22 2007-07-31 07:46 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All Content Copyright Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras unless otherwise noted.