Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras  

Go Back   Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras > Car Enthusiast Forums > Motorsports Chat

Motorsports Chat Autocross, rallycross, and track event planning, as well as general motorsport discussion.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2011-05-29, 06:46 PM   #101
dknv
EJ207
 
dknv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: 39n53, 119w90
Posts: 2,698
 
Car: RX-8
Class: CS maybe
Default

Thanks guys! And thanks to Kevin & Van for chairing the events this weekend, courses were fun!
dknv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-05-30, 12:19 AM   #102
cody
Candy Mountain
 
cody's Avatar
 
Real Name: Cody
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Posts: 7,751
 
Car: 03 Pussy Wagon, now with more pink!
Class: TESP
 
OMG Internet!
Default

Awesome weekend. I had a lot of trouble with both courses but enjoyed the challenge. I really liked the "walls" element. Today I felt like I had zero grip, but I was jacked up on Dayquil and was probably just pushing my car too hard despite the cold tires. Unlike most days, I couldn't go WOT through much of the course at all. Thanks for another great weekend despite the weather. ...really looking forward to Winnemucca.

...and congrats to all the people who kicked ass today.
__________________
Slow and low, that is the tempo.
cody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-05-30, 05:45 AM   #103
MattR
El Matador
 
MattR's Avatar
 
Real Name: Matt
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 10,660
 
Car: 2012 Toyota Tacoma
Class: ?
Default

FWD for the win! Yeah, traction was at a premium on sunday, grip levels were very different from saturday.

Winnemucca should be awesome. Last time we were there the course was insane...
__________________
"Dallas..We have a problem.”
MattR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-06-27, 09:34 AM   #104
dknv
EJ207
 
dknv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: 39n53, 119w90
Posts: 2,698
 
Car: RX-8
Class: CS maybe
Default

Winnemucca was quite the experience. Congrats to all of SECCS' fast drivers!

Some misunderstandings & communication snafus came up throughout the weekend. The biggie from Saturday was that the airport gave us permission to use a taxiway and parking pad area, however, on Saturday morning the BLM crew (who had been away fighting fires) returned to Winnemucca airport and needed exclusive access to part of the area that was used for the course (and on which run group 1 had already run). The net result was that we had to clear their area, and had to reconfigure a new course for run groups 2 & 3. I know Dave Deborde is eternally thankful to those people who helped him through that huge challenge. So, Saturday results could not be fairly factored in for the challenge results.

Another item was with respect to how the Challenge results were scored. In a nutshell, we scored all points class drivers from both regions based on raw time only, then averaged that time. I'm super glad Reno had some FAST drivers with FAST times (John Townley, Matt, Kevin, Kevin, Cody, Silvio, Vic, Bryan Nelson) - who all helped to raise Reno's average.

In the end, Snake River won the Challenge event with a small number of fast drivers in fast cars. But I know at least one SECCS and probably more drivers who will be happy with the Reno Region pax points from Sunday's results.

As is typical with an event at places like Winnemucca, Lovelock and Hawthorne, there were a good number of drivers off in the dirt, who will likely be finding little rocks & dirt in the crevices of their cars for a good while. I'll just say, it's a good thing Vic won a Car Care/Cleaning kit at Saturday night's banquet! And you all should also ask Matt about his 'big tips'. lol.
dknv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-06-27, 09:42 AM   #105
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

Wait... RAW times were used for the challenge? Seriously? No one even used some basic class separation? So if either region had one or two drivers in go-karts they would have won handily? Or if one region had 5 stock class national champs, but the other had 5 newbs in heavily modded SM cars, they'd essentially cancel out?

PAX has its problems and all, but scoring the challenge by raw times alone basically scream "if you have a slow car, we don't care how good of a driver you are, stay home".
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-06-27, 10:04 AM   #106
cody
Candy Mountain
 
cody's Avatar
 
Real Name: Cody
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Posts: 7,751
 
Car: 03 Pussy Wagon, now with more pink!
Class: TESP
 
OMG Internet!
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sperry View Post
Wait... RAW times were used for the challenge? Seriously? No one even used some basic class separation? So if either region had one or two drivers in go-karts they would have won handily? Or if one region had 5 stock class national champs, but the other had 5 newbs in heavily modded SM cars, they'd essentially cancel out?

PAX has its problems and all, but scoring the challenge by raw times alone basically scream "if you have a slow car, we don't care how good of a driver you are, stay home".
I did "Paper" in the bus during the rungroup that I was not scheduled to be working or running both days. I'm not sure if this is related, but the person running the laptop had a barrage of issues that seemed to result from inexperience and possibly lack of training. If she ever steps down, I'd be happy to take her place. I was able to help fix a couple of issues she was having, but not all of them. Anyway, I'm guessing a computer issue prevented us from using PAX? Or was it something else?
__________________
Slow and low, that is the tempo.
cody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-06-27, 10:32 AM   #107
k-dogg39
Little Slugger
 
k-dogg39's Avatar
 
Real Name: Kevin
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Lake Tahoe, NV
Posts: 777
 
Car: 05 WRB STI Wagon/00 BRP GC Sedan
Class: 39 TSM
 
I'm not crazy, I'm just passionate!
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cody View Post
I did "Paper" in the bus during the rungroup that I was not scheduled to be working or running both days. I'm not sure if this is related, but the person running the laptop had a barrage of issues that seemed to result from inexperience and possibly lack of training. If she ever steps down, I'd be happy to take her place.
THIS BIG TIME! And not just running the laptop.

I had a great time over the weekend even with all of the issues on Sat. Thanks to everyone that put together the second course so that we could continue the event.

A big time thank you to Cory, Matt and Bob at Kspeed for getting my car together for the event. It felt amazing! I am having to re-learn my car all over again. But it sure is fun!
k-dogg39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-06-27, 11:00 AM   #108
cody
Candy Mountain
 
cody's Avatar
 
Real Name: Cody
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Posts: 7,751
 
Car: 03 Pussy Wagon, now with more pink!
Class: TESP
 
OMG Internet!
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by k-dogg39 View Post
THIS BIG TIME! And not just running the laptop.

I had a great time over the weekend even with all of the issues on Sat. Thanks to everyone that put together the second course so that we could continue the event.

A big time thank you to Cory, Matt and Bob at Kspeed for getting my car together for the event. It felt amazing! I am having to re-learn my car all over again. But it sure is fun!


Even with all the frustrations this weekend, it was a good time overall and I was really impressed with the good attitude of most everyone I met/saw. I guess with the costs and difficulties, these away events are getting harder and harder to put on. I hope we do this same event again next year but I hope it goes off without a hitch. I do miss getting into 3rd gear like I did in Hawthorne though. High speed slaloming FTW.
__________________
Slow and low, that is the tempo.

Last edited by cody; 2011-06-27 at 11:03 AM.
cody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-06-27, 11:17 AM   #109
MattR
El Matador
 
MattR's Avatar
 
Real Name: Matt
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 10,660
 
Car: 2012 Toyota Tacoma
Class: ?
Default

Yeah Scott, I agree, a RAW-time challenge is not really a challenge, most of their region is on race tires, and they had some fast mod cars, there was no way we could have won. Dave made the decision, not sure what factors he was weighing, maybe he wanted to get rid of that huge trophy? Interesting enough, the difference in average time was about 2 seconds.

CODY, I suggest you talk to Don Smith asap...hint.
__________________
"Dallas..We have a problem.”
MattR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-06-27, 11:25 AM   #110
dknv
EJ207
 
dknv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: 39n53, 119w90
Posts: 2,698
 
Car: RX-8
Class: CS maybe
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sperry View Post
Wait... RAW times were used for the challenge? Seriously? No one even used some basic class separation? So if either region had one or two drivers in go-karts they would have won handily? Or if one region had 5 stock class national champs, but the other had 5 newbs in heavily modded SM cars, they'd essentially cancel out?

PAX has its problems and all, but scoring the challenge by raw times alone basically scream "if you have a slow car, we don't care how good of a driver you are, stay home".
I posted over on the Renoscca forum about some of the reasoning for using raw time for scoring. This was a small event, only 40-something drivers for the challenge with many 1-driver classes. If it was a bigger event, and if there were monetary payouts, I think I might be more concerned about refining the scoring approach for the Challenge event itself. Maybe it will be bigger next year. For Reno drivers, it is best to keep in mind that our street tire factors & pax will still be used for our region's points scoring.

Cody: like you (and thanks for your extra efforts, both in doing the morning reg/waivers, plus working the extra run group) -- Rach & I and many others in both regions worked extra run groups both days. I know Dave & Carol appreciate our extra efforts tremendously.

Just a little comment about the 'inexperience/lack of training' situation -- I was frustrated by some of this as well, but am also trying to keep the perspective that this volunteer hasn't been out all season until now, and spent quite a bit of effort before the event started, after the end of each day, and didn't even drive.
dknv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-06-27, 11:43 AM   #111
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dknv View Post
I posted over on the Renoscca forum about some of the reasoning for using raw time for scoring. This was a small event, only 40-something drivers for the challenge with many 1-driver classes. If it was a bigger event, and if there were monetary payouts, I think I might be more concerned about refining the scoring approach for the Challenge event itself. Maybe it will be bigger next year. For Reno drivers, it is best to keep in mind that our street tire factors & pax will still be used for our region's points scoring.

Cody: like you (and thanks for your extra efforts, both in doing the morning reg/waivers, plus working the extra run group) -- Rach & I and many others in both regions worked extra run groups both days. I know Dave & Carol appreciate our extra efforts tremendously.

Just a little comment about the 'inexperience/lack of training' situation -- I was frustrated by some of this as well, but am also trying to keep the perspective that this volunteer hasn't been out all season until now, and spent quite a bit of effort before the event started, after the end of each day, and didn't even drive.
Considering the software MikeK wrote can automatically calculate the results for Hawthorne, I'm surprised we didn't just use that, since it can take into account all the classes as long as we have a PAX for each... and even if it's a PAX of 1.0 for some of the odd-ball classes, it allows them to still contribute to the results at least as fairly as scoring the whole thing on raw times.

I guess it doesn't really make a difference to me, since I wasn't even there. And I'm certainly not bitter at all over losing the trophy, again because I'm not much into autocross these days. I think I'm just irked mostly because the difficulty of scoring a challenge is really non-existent due to Mike's hard work, which was based on the Dean's big effort when designing the original spreadsheet for scoring Hawethorne. To hear that we scored the event on raw times because doing it in a way that would encourage participation was "too complicated" is disappointing.

And it's not like there was any real discussion on how the event was going to be scored before hand. I read the threads on the RenoSCCA board... and at no point was the scoring method for the event made public. I just assumed they you guys would use the existing scoring method from Hawthorne and previous Winnemucca events... not just make something up at the event. Really, the decision should have been made and publicized before hand... if it had, I probably would have suggested using our existing software, but as a non-competitor I wouldn't have pushed for it. If raw times really were the way everyone wanted to do it, then that's an awesome "run what you brung" battle... I just don't get the feeling that's how it went down.
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-06-27, 12:55 PM   #112
MikeK
Captain Turbo
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Reno
Posts: 3,318
 
Car: 05 STi
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sperry View Post
Considering the software MikeK wrote can automatically calculate the results for Hawthorne, I'm surprised we didn't just use that, since it can take into account all the classes as long as we have a PAX for each... and even if it's a PAX of 1.0 for some of the odd-ball classes, it allows them to still contribute to the results at least as fairly as scoring the whole thing on raw times.
The reason this software wasn't used (and I believe the reason that raw time was used) is that I couldn't be at the event and no one wanted to rely on spotty internet connection to get me the results over the weekend. I know how to use the software I wrote, but it isn't exactly minesweeper

Being pragmatic about it, it was probably the right decision.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sperry View Post
And it's not like there was any real discussion on how the event was going to be scored before hand. I read the threads on the RenoSCCA board... and at no point was the scoring method for the event made public. I just assumed they you guys would use the existing scoring method from Hawthorne and previous Winnemucca events... not just make something up at the event. Really, the decision should have been made and publicized before hand... if it had, I probably would have suggested using our existing software, but as a non-competitor I wouldn't have pushed for it. If raw times really were the way everyone wanted to do it, then that's an awesome "run what you brung" battle... I just don't get the feeling that's how it went down.
There was an email chain that went around, but it was essentially "hey, how do we score this thing". I said what it would take to use the software I wrote, then essentially a few days before the event the decision was made to just use excel at the event to calculate who won.

Honestly what I have is powerful but isn't user friendly at all. I cannot say that doing the calculations manually was the wrong way to go. And using PAX instead of raw time was probably mathematically preferable, but given the reality of having someone at the event who might not be so computer literate trying to do those calculations, it can be quite a risk. I remember the last year before I wrote that software when you and I (mostly you) did those calculations by hand in excel, and it took a couple of hours.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dknv
Just a little comment about the 'inexperience/lack of training' situation -- I was frustrated by some of this as well, but am also trying to keep the perspective that this volunteer hasn't been out all season until now, and spent quite a bit of effort before the event started, after the end of each day, and didn't even drive.
As someone who has been stuck with that awful thankless job for years, I can say that whoever the person was, they should be thanked for even showing up and doing it. I took a year off from the sport just to get out of that shitty position. There is no training, the software sucks balls (an not in a good way), and the only time you hear from anyone about the job you are doing is when stuff starts going wrong.
MikeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-06-27, 01:00 PM   #113
sperry
The Doink
 
sperry's Avatar
 
Real Name: Scott
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 20,335
 
Car: '09 OBXT, '02 WRX, '96 Miata
Class: PDX/TT-6
 
The way out is through
Default

The long time in the Hawthorne calculations wasn't due to PAX or anything... it was due to having to audit all the messed up times in the results vs. the paper. Back then we couldn't rely on AXWare at all, not only did the software itself crash all the time and screw up the results, the user interface was bad enough that user errors were constantly occurring and introducing discrepancies. Plus, IIRC, the software didn't score times the way we did PAX back then either, so there was still another manual step using that software I wrote that took the exported results from AXWare. So there were a ton of steps, none of which had anything really to do with calculating the final average PAX results... the spreadsheet Dean made did that great, assuming the data you had to paste into it was right.
__________________
Is you is, or is you ain't, my con-stit-u-ints?
sperry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-06-27, 01:25 PM   #114
dknv
EJ207
 
dknv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: 39n53, 119w90
Posts: 2,698
 
Car: RX-8
Class: CS maybe
Default

omg, I'm thankful we didn't have issues with the timing lights as well. Remember when we couldn't even run 2 cars in a row before something interfered with one set of lights, and more timers would start running? You guys used to have to deal with those issues too.
dknv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-06-27, 01:52 PM   #115
cody
Candy Mountain
 
cody's Avatar
 
Real Name: Cody
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Posts: 7,751
 
Car: 03 Pussy Wagon, now with more pink!
Class: TESP
 
OMG Internet!
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattR View Post
Yeah Scott, I agree, a RAW-time challenge is not really a challenge, most of their region is on race tires, and they had some fast mod cars, there was no way we could have won. Dave made the decision, not sure what factors he was weighing, maybe he wanted to get rid of that huge trophy? Interesting enough, the difference in average time was about 2 seconds.

CODY, I suggest you talk to Don Smith asap...hint.
PM'd him. Mike's description sold me.
__________________
Slow and low, that is the tempo.
cody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-06-27, 02:19 PM   #116
MikeK
Captain Turbo
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Reno
Posts: 3,318
 
Car: 05 STi
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cody View Post
PM'd him. Mike's description sold me.
Unless you PM'd him to say "fuck that", I would have to say that my description didn't sell you
MikeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-06-27, 02:22 PM   #117
k-dogg39
Little Slugger
 
k-dogg39's Avatar
 
Real Name: Kevin
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Lake Tahoe, NV
Posts: 777
 
Car: 05 WRB STI Wagon/00 BRP GC Sedan
Class: 39 TSM
 
I'm not crazy, I'm just passionate!
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeK View Post
As someone who has been stuck with that awful thankless job for years, I can say that whoever the person was, they should be thanked for even showing up and doing it.
I would thank that person, but I would probably get yelled at again for nothing.
k-dogg39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-06-27, 07:40 PM   #118
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

I asked Dave about it, and basically he said that raw times were used instead of PAX because of the large number of Tuner class drivers, and he was concerned about having a number of drivers who were there who wouldn't count for scoring the challenge.

In the future, we can call all W-class cars TSU cars, since they're all legal there and we have a long-established PAX factor. PAX times are every bit as easy to write down and average as raw times are (especially when there are fewer than 50 per day) so I think we can safely say that there is no call for punting the challenge again.

After Sunday I was in the bus and was poking around menus looking to figure out how to plug the event in to the scoring software that I know Mike has written, but have never laid eyes on. Mike, I'd be willing to learn exactly how to do it for next year so we can get complete results on site.
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-06-27, 08:01 PM   #119
Dean
Señor Cheap Bastarde
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Real Name: Dean
Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
 
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
 
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
Default

Understanding ALL the equipment in the bus, PA, timing, etc. and being able to set it up and troubleshoot it is a skill that needs to be spread around. We keep killing the one person that knows how to do it.

We really need one or more people from every run group that actually understands computers and electronics to some extent. None of it is difficult if you have most any sort of hands dirty tech background.

Cables have to be plugged in to the right places and have continuity. Things have to be turned on/have power. PC has to be connected to other stuff correctly and files/directories managed. Last but not least, actually know the software and how to setup an event and add/edit driver and time info in real time and post run group.

Results are only a nightmare when you are trying to recreate them after the fact with bad paper. They are trivial to fix before a driver takes a run, during the run group or right after a run group and get exponentially harder after that.

As Scott said, Hawthorne scoring via spreadsheet was easy when the data was clean.
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids...

Last edited by Dean; 2011-06-27 at 08:06 PM.
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-08, 07:40 AM   #120
MikeK
Captain Turbo
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Reno
Posts: 3,318
 
Car: 05 STi
Default

Round 6 results are up.

If I ever get the round 5 results and they aren't completely hosed, they might be used to add an extra day of class points. There won't be any pax points since the course changed during the day.

Don't hold your breath though!
MikeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-08, 07:52 AM   #121
cody
Candy Mountain
 
cody's Avatar
 
Real Name: Cody
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Posts: 7,751
 
Car: 03 Pussy Wagon, now with more pink!
Class: TESP
 
OMG Internet!
Default

Thanks Mike! I think Street Prepared Two is labeled incorrectly as Street Prepared Three. Obviously no biggie though. I got beat up by a Cobalt! If only my 7th run had counted.
__________________
Slow and low, that is the tempo.
cody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-08, 09:06 AM   #122
van
SECCS Brewmeister
 
van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: on the edge of a marsh
Posts: 1,451
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeK View Post

If I ever get the round 5 results and they aren't completely hosed,
They are.
van is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-16, 06:08 PM   #123
MikeK
Captain Turbo
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Reno
Posts: 3,318
 
Car: 05 STi
Default

Round 7 results posted
MikeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-16, 06:48 PM   #124
van
SECCS Brewmeister
 
van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: on the edge of a marsh
Posts: 1,451
Default

Thanks Mike
van is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-07-17, 04:48 PM   #125
MikeK
Captain Turbo
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Reno
Posts: 3,318
 
Car: 05 STi
Default

Round 8 results posted
MikeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official NASCAR thread...(spoilers) Dean Motorsports Chat 170 2013-05-16 05:39 PM
Yet Another Brake Pad Thread. Dean Technical Chat 83 2009-05-10 02:43 PM
Autocross & Track tires that fit Subarus... Dean Motorsports Chat 17 2007-06-27 09:19 AM
July 5th/6th Atwater Autocross pics and movies sperry Motorsports Chat 13 2003-07-07 04:40 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All Content Copyright Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras unless otherwise noted.