|  | 
| 
 Econobox research Okay, so we're looking into getting another car since our Mazda is getting closer to death with each passing day.  And by "closer to death" I don't just mean it's falling apart, I mean I may put a brick on the gas pedal and run the goddamn thing off a cliff because I'm so fed up with it.  So anyway... We're looking into econoboxes that get good mileage, like maybe a late 90s/early 00's Honda Civic. Laura likes them because they're "cute" & get good mileage. I like the thought because what little I've read about them says that they're reliable (which means I won't lose any wrenching time on the Mustang taking care of her car all the time) and you can get them for under $10k with decent miles on the clock. I figured you guys might know more about these cars than I do, since they're part of the 4-banger world. :wink: Anyone have the low down on these cars? Reliability? Ease of component replacement? Any other suggestions on cars that are comparable? Thanks... :D | 
| 
 I have a 88 Civic DX HB with over 330K miles.  The car is still on its original engine and trans.  I have replaced the wter pump, timing belt (three times since I have had it) and starter since I had it and thats it.  The thing still runs like a champ but burns oil.  But at 330K, a quart every two weeks is nothing.   I have owned this pile of heap and another 89 Si and both are bulletproof. The 89 hit a cow head on and still ran fine....although severly pulling to the left. For an econobox, the 88-91 civic HB is a great deal. most could be picked up for less than 4K, in decent condition. My last HB I bought for $500 is still my daily driver. | 
| 
 Remember my '88 Legend?  That car was just an upscale Honda Accord.  If you can find a V6 Accord from the yearly 90's you'll probably get a decent car.  However, I'd bet a newer Civic (late 90's) would cost the same, last longer, and get better fuel mileage. | 
| 
 My friend has 2 '88 CRX's that have been through hell and back and still run pretty good for each having over 150k on the clock and multiple accidents. | 
| 
 If we got an EX coupe we could be straight up ricers in our Civic... VTEC-ahhh!!  :lol: | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 1 Attachment(s) Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Austin, do you get Consumers Reports?  If it were me, I'd be looking at the used car guide in the annual car issue, to see what's reliable & safe. If you're going nippon anyway, get an impreza :lol: . | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 3 years ago I got a 93 Corolla wagon for $5.5k.  It doesn't look like it will die anytime in the near future, and I haven't had to do anything more then oil changes to keep it running. And if you are spending upwards of $10k, you could probably get a much newer one, with less miles and whatnot. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 I just hit up Edmunds for their list of "best used car bets" where they rate the best used cars from 1997-2002. Economy Car: Honda Civic Midsized Car: Toyota Camry Large Car: Ford Crown Vic Luxury Car: Lexus ES 300 Sports Car: Mazda Miata Here's what they said about the Civic and the Camry: Quote: 
 | 
| 
 I would take the equivalent Corolla over a Civic every time. They match up very well in reliability, economy, and safety, but you'll pay $1500 less for the Corolla. Also, The late 90's Geo Prizms were rebadged Corollas, and you can save even more on those while still buying "american". :) | 
| 
 Thanks for all the input, we're gonna look at Corollas too since they look pretty damn equivalent & also cheaper (always good).   8) | 
| 
 Quote: 
 Plus they're mad tite y0! http://ominous.freewebspace.com/rice/corolla.jpg | 
| 
 Dizam, we could be Big Pimpin in one of those... | 
| 
 Hey Austin: Someone's selling a '96 Civic DX 5MT 4-door, white, new tires, here at work for $3500. Assuming that it's in decent condition with (I'm guessing) about 100,000 miles, that's a pretty fair price according to Edmunds.com. | 
| 
 That's pretty cheap, but DX != VTEC... plus it's got a bunch o' miles and probably needs its timing belt replaced. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 I don't wanna have to replace a friggin timing belt on a car for hopefully several years at least. Don't get me started on timing belts... any design that recommends a 60,000 mile replacement interval or risk destruction of the engine is a bad design, and it seems like almost all of these 4-bangers have them. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:15 AM. | 
	Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
	
	All Content Copyright Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras unless otherwise noted.