Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras  

Go Back   Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras > Car Enthusiast Forums > General Subaru Discussion & Club Chat

General Subaru Discussion & Club Chat Talk about Subarus, plan meets, and other Sierra Nevada area Suby stuff!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2005-08-16, 01:17 PM   #101
knucklesplitter
EJ205
 
Real Name: Matt Taylor
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cousin-F*ck, Carolina
Posts: 1,474
 
Wish in one hand and sh*t in the other...
Default

That's a nice feature. Perhaps since Cobb basically reflashes the ECU, the reprogrammed ECU has capabilities to adjust for elevation that I am not used to seeing.

Still, I'm skeptical, having seen the AccessPort vary boost dramatically with elevation no matter which map Cobb gave me to load - high WGC, low WGC, semi-custom. Also the stock ECU is prone to do this too.
knucklesplitter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-16, 01:57 PM   #102
cody
Candy Mountain
 
cody's Avatar
 
Real Name: Cody
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Posts: 7,751
 
Car: 03 Pussy Wagon, now with more pink!
Class: TESP
 
OMG Internet!
Default

I thought you might find this interesting, this is Ed's latest email to me.
Quote:
Sadly I cannot send these as real time maps because the tables I'm altering are only included in the base map format. In this latest one, I extended high altitude wastegate duty cycles a bit more as well as made the high altitude boost trim less aggressive. Let me know how this one does, and as always make sure to watch for spiking.
__________________
Slow and low, that is the tempo.
cody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-16, 02:02 PM   #103
Dean
Seņor Cheap Bastarde
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Real Name: Dean
Join Date: May 2003
Location: $99 Tire Store
Posts: 9,294
 
Car: $.04 STI
Class: Fast,Cheap & Reliable=STI
 
Deal, did somebody say Deal? Oh, Dean, yeah that's me.
Default

Boost will always decrase with altitude unless you had a variable pitch configuration somehow on the turbo which I can't imagine how you would begin to do. There is less air, period and efficiency goes down. The Pikes Peek Tuning
post was great on this stuff...

I guess you could size the turbo and design the two sides for higher altitude, but I think your sea level performance would suffer.
__________________
I am a Commodore PET --- Now get off my lawn you kids...
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-16, 02:13 PM   #104
cody
Candy Mountain
 
cody's Avatar
 
Real Name: Cody
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Posts: 7,751
 
Car: 03 Pussy Wagon, now with more pink!
Class: TESP
 
OMG Internet!
Default

Good info in that link. Do you guys think targeting boost at 17 PSI up here is dangerous?
__________________
Slow and low, that is the tempo.
cody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-16, 02:20 PM   #105
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

Yes. Research the difference between pressure ratio and absolute/relative manifold pressure. Compressor efficiency maps don't read in "boost" they read in air flow vs. pressure ratio. Exceeding the most efficient pressure ratio at a given amount of power produces excess heat and puts tress on your turbo's internals.

Edit: 17 psi up here peak, tapering to the normal 12-13 psi at redline, is probably okay. Not as efficient as that curve is at sea leel, but probably not dangerous either.
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-16, 02:26 PM   #106
doubleurx
EJ205
 
doubleurx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Truckee
Posts: 1,948
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
Yes. Research the difference between pressure ratio and absolute/relative manifold pressure. Compressor efficiency maps don't read in "boost" they read in air flow vs. pressure ratio. Exceeding the most efficient pressure ratio at a given amount of power produces excess heat and puts tress on your turbo's internals.

Edit: 17 psi up here peak, tapering to the normal 12-13 psi at redline, is probably okay. Not as efficient as that curve is at sea leel, but probably not dangerous either.
17PSI? I'm at a steady 20.
doubleurx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-16, 02:26 PM   #107
knucklesplitter
EJ205
 
Real Name: Matt Taylor
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cousin-F*ck, Carolina
Posts: 1,474
 
Wish in one hand and sh*t in the other...
Default

True that as altitude goes up, your turbo efficiency goes down, and the maximum potential power goes down. I agree with this totally and have argued till blue in the face with the "turbos make the same power at altitude" crowd.

What I'm talking about is something else I think. Take a turbo that has excess capacity - say the VF39 in stock configuration. The boost is not limited by the turbo at say 4000 rpm, it is limited by the wastegate opening and bleeding off the exhaust pressure as modulated by the ECU-controlled boost solenoid. If programmed to, the turbo is loafing along making 14 or 15psi at sea level and wastegating like crazy. This configuration will make 1-2psi less boost (guage) at 5000'. This doesn't change as the ECU "learns" either. That's not a turbo efficiency issue, it's a wastegate regulation issue. It's like the control system for the boost needs different parameters at elevation. This is a mystery to me and I wish somebody could explain it.
knucklesplitter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-16, 02:46 PM   #108
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doubleurx
17PSI? I'm at a steady 20.
You're not using a TD04 or an EJ20.
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-16, 02:49 PM   #109
Kevin M
EJ22T
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Reno
Posts: 9,445
 
Car: '93/'01 GF6, mostly red
Class: 19 FP
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by knucklesplitter
True that as altitude goes up, your turbo efficiency goes down, and the maximum potential power goes down. I agree with this totally and have argued till blue in the face with the "turbos make the same power at altitude" crowd.

What I'm talking about is something else I think. Take a turbo that has excess capacity - say the VF39 in stock configuration. The boost is not limited by the turbo at say 4000 rpm, it is limited by the wastegate opening and bleeding off the exhaust pressure as modulated by the ECU-controlled boost solenoid. If programmed to, the turbo is loafing along making 14 or 15psi at sea level and wastegating like crazy. This configuration will make 1-2psi less boost (guage) at 5000'. This doesn't change as the ECU "learns" either. That's not a turbo efficiency issue, it's a wastegate regulation issue. It's like the control system for the boost needs different parameters at elevation. This is a mystery to me and I wish somebody could explain it.
Basically, Subaru got to 300/300 on the EJ257 and said "okay, that's plenty." And since boost is not part of the learning parameters of the ECU, it doesn't change. Which is by design- can you imagine the number of people going to the service department freaking out because their STi makes 1 or 2 pounds more or less boost today than it did yesterday?
__________________
FWD is the new AWD
Kevin M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-16, 02:55 PM   #110
sonicsuby
Wagon Ho #2
 
sonicsuby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
Basically, Subaru got to 300/300 on the EJ257 and said "okay, that's plenty." And since boost is not part of the learning parameters of the ECU, it doesn't change. Which is by design- can you imagine the number of people going to the service department freaking out because their STi makes 1 or 2 pounds more or less boost today than it did yesterday?
If they didn't have the Subaru boost gauge SOA would just deny the claim
sonicsuby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-20, 11:25 AM   #111
cody
Candy Mountain
 
cody's Avatar
 
Real Name: Cody
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Posts: 7,751
 
Car: 03 Pussy Wagon, now with more pink!
Class: TESP
 
OMG Internet!
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
Yes. Research the difference between pressure ratio and absolute/relative manifold pressure. Compressor efficiency maps don't read in "boost" they read in air flow vs. pressure ratio. Exceeding the most efficient pressure ratio at a given amount of power produces excess heat and puts tress on your turbo's internals.

Edit: 17 psi up here peak, tapering to the normal 12-13 psi at redline, is probably okay. Not as efficient as that curve is at sea leel, but probably not dangerous either.
I'm now on my 2nd map update from Ed and I'm holding up to 17.5 PSI with the normal taper up here. But I think my gauge may read a touch higher than the ECU's boost sensor. Anyway, my boost is holding solid till it tapers above 6K RPM's. The car feels super fast and smooth. I just hope this isn't dangerously high boost. I love my car and would never want to hurt her.
__________________
Slow and low, that is the tempo.
cody is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dyno Numbers Dean Technical Chat 519 2019-02-24 10:29 AM
Stebro Exhaust sperry General Subaru Discussion & Club Chat 7 2007-01-19 03:56 PM
STI Exhaust mpeyton Technical Chat 1 2006-12-18 10:56 AM
Invidia Turboback Catless Exhaust - ArthurS User Classifieds 16 2004-11-04 11:03 AM
Ginormous NorCal road trip! TONS OF PICTURES! sperry General Subaru Discussion & Club Chat 15 2003-10-21 09:05 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All Content Copyright Subaru Enthusiasts Car Club of the Sierras unless otherwise noted.